Table 1. Number of trees in different categories (Usnea longissima present, newly established, disappeared, or if the tree had fallen to the ground), in 2012 compared to 2005/06, within study sites and whether the trees were influenced by the experimental selective loggings. The five last columns show forest stand level information. Sites with no logging are shaded.
Site	Not influenced by logging				Influenced by logging				Tree not relocated	Total no. of trees	Size of location a) (ha)	Standing volume pre logging b) (m3ha–1)	Percentage logged at forest stand level b)	DBH c) (cm) (± st.dev)	Altitude (m a.s.l)
	Lichen present	New establ.	Dis- appeared	Tree fallen	Lichen present	New establ.	Dis- appeared	Tree fallen
A1	20	9								29	0.22	212	0	17.3 ± 5.4	490
A2	31	4	3		18	6				62	0.80	283	53	24.1 ± 9.0	490
E4					8	2	2	1	2	15	0.18	205	41	25.3 ± 11.9	530
E6	14		2	1	12	3	1		1	34	0.44	344	52	26.1 ± 12.2	565
E7	45	3	16	3	19	5	5	1	2	99	1.01	324	50	23.1 ± 10.0	580
E8 d)					59	15	11	3	3	91	0.76	280	50	18.8 ± 7.7	530
E9	21	2	2							25	0.24	254	0	23.1 ± 10.1	520
K1					15	1	7	1	1	25	0.27	188	43	25.5 ± 8.4	685
K2					12	1				13	0.21	218	41	23.1 ± 9.5	700
K3	5		2						1	8	0.19	155	0	21.3 ± 7.5	730
Total	136	18	25	4	143	33	26	6	10	401
a) Area of location of trees with U. longissima. b) From Vestad (2008). c) Mean size of trees ≥10 cm DBH. 44–75 trees were measured in each site. From Storaunet et al. (2008). d) Parts of site E8 was not included in the 2012-inventory, since the stand had been exposed to wind throws and quite a few trees had died from drought.