Table A1. Pairwise comparisons of species for all nutrients in fine woody debris (FWD). Comparisons with significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
Species comparisons Nutrients (mg kg–1)
C (%) N P K Ca Mg Na Mn Al B Cu Fe Zn
F. nigra vs. A. balsamea <.0001 0.2692 0.7768 0.5241 0.3495 0.3905 0.6208 <.0001 0.0590 <.0001 0.3195 0.9958 <.0001
F. nigra vs. B. papyrifera <.0001 0.9912 0.0490 0.0003 0.9798 0.7836 0.0054 <.0001 0.4525 0.0002 0.6378 0.0949 <.0001
F. nigra vs. A. rubrum 0.2065 0.1898 1.0000 <.0001 0.6041 0.0096 0.7553 <.0001 0.8343 0.0028 0.0306 0.8520 0.2122
F. nigra vs. P. tremuloides 0.0028 0.5318 0.6956 0.0354 0.0736 0.9350 0.0364 0.2255 0.1037 0.0485 0.4463 0.0470 <.0001
A. balsamea vs. B. papyrifera 0.3886 0.1082 0.4782 0.0451 0.1197 0.9681 0.2125 0.9500 0.0003 0.2416 0.9847 0.2090 <.0001
A. balsamea vs. A. rubrum <.0001 0.9997 0.8194 0.0202 0.9937 0.5106 0.9995 0.0480 0.0027 0.0522 0.8269 0.9693 0.0026
A. balsamea vs. P. tremuloides 0.0519 0.0052 0.9999 0.6602 0.0002 0.0858 0.5707 <.0001 <.0001 0.0031 0.0046 0.1154 0.0002
B. papyrifera vs. A. rubrum <.0001 0.0697 0.0602 0.9984 0.2725 0.1800 0.1360 0.2404 0.9690 0.9570 0.5124 0.5553 <.0001
B. papyrifera vs. P. tremuloides 0.0002 0.8066 0.5667 0.5827 0.2448 0.3118 0.9665 <.0001 0.9286 0.4710 0.0228 0.9985 0.1046
A. rubrum vs. P. tremuloides <.0001 0.0028 0.7438 0.3998 0.0009 0.0007 0.4322 <.0001 0.6044 0.8752 0.0001 0.3788 <.0001
Table A2. Mean coarse woody debris (CWD) nutrient concentrations for each species by decay class with standard errors in parentheses. Carbon is presented in percent total (%) while all other nutrients are in mg kg–1. Sample sizes within each species/decay class combination are n = 10.
Nutrient Species
Populus tremuloides Acer rubrum Betula papyrifera Fraxinus nigra Abies balsamea
Decay class Decay class Decay class Decay class Decay class
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
C 49.1
(0.1)
48.6
(0.3)
49.6
(0.1)
46.9
(0.3)
48.4
(0.2)
49.3
(0.4)
47.9
(0.3)
48.1
(0.2)
49.3
(0.7)
48.4
(0.1)
48.6
(0.1)
49.4
(0.2)
50.8
(0.1)
50.4
(0.3)
50.5
(0.1)
N 24.0
(0.0)
24.0
(0.0)
55.9
(31.9)
24.0
(0.0)
26.7
(2.7)
180.1
(156.1)
80.0
(56.0)
59.6
(35.6)
646.8
(290.0)
865.3
(221.8)
556.9
(148.8)
2231.0
(342.3)
380.2
(183.4)
329.8
(123.1)
437.3
(167.1)
P 163
(20)
118
(16)
75
(16)
131
(11)
137
(16)
141
(18)
141
(17)
98
(10)
125
(27)
81
(6)
84
(8)
88
(13)
113
(16)
105
(17)
75
(9)
K 1384
(102)
1357
(107)
1317
(576)
1292
(162)
1562
(489)
1701
(464)
695
(151)
783
(239)
723
(154)
3007
(304)
2849
(316)
3508
(886)
2144
(230)
2545
(447)
2005
(283)
Ca 5556
(581)
4691
(318)
4959
(1335)
2054
(205)
3045
(432)
4066
(473)
2082
(328)
3064
(633)
4400
(970)
3964
(304)
4086
(268)
6060
(984)
2268
(148)
2227
(270)
2977
(345)
Na 21.2
(2.2)
18.4
(2.3)
20.8
(3.8)
21.1
(1.7)
18.4
(0.9)
23.4
(1.9)
16.7
(2.5)
22.1
(4.6)
30.3
(5.4)
33.5
(4.0)
33.9
(4.0)
50.4
(7.8)
37.4
(3.5)
29.0
(4.5)
36.5
(4.2)
Mg 464
(40)
427
(35)
462
(94)
237
(25)
327
(43)
466
(50)
267
(19)
407
(85)
442
(57)
368
(20)
412
(26)
834
(183)
353
(28)
399
(53)
373
(21)
Mn 14.7
(2.5)
12.8
(1.5)
16.7
(2.9)
91.5
(10.3)
98.8
(11.1)
191.3
(44.3)
111.6
(17.3)
115.1
(24.6)
156.7
(26.2)
6.3
(0.8)
5.9
(0.8)
14.7
(2.1)
121.8
(14.9)
113.5
(30.0)
109.3
(26.6)
Al 6.2
(2.3)
3.3
(0.7)
10.7
(2.3)
4.2
(0.7)
3.3
(0.4)
6.1
(1.2)
3.1
(0.6)
2.2
(0.3)
5.4
(1.0)
4.4
(1.5)
4.1
(0.7)
20.6
(6.2)
17.2
(4.1)
11.3
(3.2)
11.5
(1.5)
B 4.0
(0.3)
3.4
(0.3)
3.8
(0.8)
2.7
(0.2)
3.5
(0.2)
5.1
(0.6)
2.3
(0.2)
3.4
(0.6)
5.8
(1.1)
5.5
(0.3)
6.3
(0.8)
12.5
(2.5)
2.3
(0.2)
2.5
(0.2)
2.7
(0.3)
Cu 2.2
(0.1)
2.4
(0.3)
2.9
(0.5)
1.4
(0.1)
2.1
(0.4)
2.7
(0.4)
1.6
(0.4)
1.3
(0.1)
2.0
(0.3)
1.4
(0.1)
1.5
(0.2)
2.3
(0.4)
1.6
(0.1)
1.5
(0.1)
1.7
(0.2)
Fe 28.0
(10.6)
14.3
(2.8)
24.8
(5.7)
17.5
(2.8)
21.4
(3.4)
14.1
(1.8)
9.2
(1.3)
9.2
(1.3)
14.0
(2.1)
14.4
(3.5)
15.6
(2.8)
45.7
(10.9)
22.9
(7.9)
11.3
(1.4)
16.6
(1.9)
Zn 55.9
(4.2)
46.2
(3.0)
49.1
(9.5)
7.7
(0.9)
10.8
(1.0)
19.9
(3.4)
58.9
(6.0)
90.0
(18.2)
122.7
(17.9)
2.4
(0.3)
2.5
(0.3)
4.7
(1.0)
16.1
(1.7)
17.9
(1.6)
19.1
(2.5)
Table A3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) table with pairwise comparisons for all macronutrients (C, N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) in coarse woody debris (CWD) by species and decay class including the source of variation, degrees of freedom (d.f.) for both the numerator and denominator, and F-values and probabilities for each nutrient analyzed. Comparisons among species and decay class are presented with significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) highlighted in bold.
Source of variation d.f.
(numerator)
d.f.
(denominator)
C (%) N (mg kg–1) P (mg kg–1) K (mg kg–1) Ca (mg kg–1) Mg (mg kg–1)
    F p F p F p F p F p F p
Species 4 135 45.67 <.0001 42.02 <.0001 6.54 <.0001 33.68 <.0001 18.11 <.0001 5.46 0.0004
Decay class 2 135 23.02 <.0001 8.45 0.0003 5.99 0.0032 0.93 0.3954 5.41 0.0055 8.35 0.0004
Species X Decay class 8 135 2.99 0.0040 1.13 0.3478 2.36 0.0209 0.47 0.8725 2.72 0.0081 2.37 0.0203
Comparisons
F. nigra vs. A. balsamea   <.0001   <.0001   0.8510   0.1379   <.0001   0.1915
F. nigra vs. B. papyrifera   0.1174   <.0001   0.0387   <.0001   <.0001   0.0106
F. nigra vs. A. rubrum   0.0545   <.0001   <.0001   <.0001   0.0003   0.0049
F. nigra vs. P. tremuloides   0.1136   <.0001   0.0879   <.0001   0.9782   0.9984
A. balsamea vs. B. papyrifera   <.0001   0.0550   0.3485   <.0001   0.7070   0.7968
A. balsamea vs. A. rubrum   <.0001   <.0001   0.0029   0.0007   0.3937   0.6577
A. balsamea vs. P. tremuloides   <.0001   <.0001   0.5440   0.0001   <.0001   0.3269
B. papyrifera vs. A. rubrum   0.9978   0.1593   0.3522   0.0009   0.9874   0.9993
B. papyrifera vs. P. tremuloides   <.0001   0.0654   0.9977   0.0047   <.0001   0.0255
A. rubrum vs. P. tremuloides   <.0001   0.9953   0.1992   0.9897   <.0001   0.0126
Decay1 vs. Decay2   0.7801   0.9954   0.1504   0.9983   0.3895   0.1435
Decay1 vs. Decay3   <.0001   0.0017   0.0021   0.4487   0.0039   0.0002
Decay2 vs. Decay3   <.0001   0.0013   0.2563   0.4823   0.1276   0.0770
Table A4. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) table with pairwise comparisons for all micronutrients (Na, Mn, Al, B, Cu, Fe, and Zn) in coarse woody debris (CWD) by species and decay class including the source of variation, degrees of freedom (d.f.) for both the numerator and denominator, and F-values and probabilities for each nutrient analyzed. Comparisons among species and decay class are presented with significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) highlighted in bold.
Source of variation d.f.
(numerator)
d.f.
(denominator)
Na (mg kg–1) Mn (mg kg–1) Al (mg kg–1) B (mg kg–1) Cu (mg kg–1) Fe (mg kg–1) Zn (mg kg–1)
      F P F p F p F p F p F p F p
Species 4 135 17.52 <.0001 94.57 <.0001 16.15 <.0001 36.86 <.0001 9.24 <.0001 4.22 0.0030 300.54 <.0001
Decay class 2 135 5.59 0.0047 4.94 0.0085 20.01 <.0001 12.06 <.0001 7.60 0.0007 6.26 0.0025 8.40 0.0004
Species X Decay class 8 135 1.09 0.3763 1.27 0.2644 2.26 0.027 4.41 <.0001 1.73 0.0977 2.21 0.0305 4.05 0.0002
Comparisons
F. nigra vs. A. balsamea   0.9777   <.0001   0.0003   <.0001   1.0000   0.7122   <.0001
F. nigra vs. B. papyrifera   <.0001   <.0001   0.0102   <.0001   0.9643   0.0043   <.0001
F. nigra vs. A. rubrum   <.0001   <.0001   0.4594   <.0001   0.1501   1.0000   <.0001
F. nigra vs. P. tremuloides   <.0001   0.0369   0.9607   <.0001   0.0001   0.9124   <.0001
A. balsamea vs. B. papyrifera   0.0004   0.8168   <.0001   0.0117   0.9365   0.1472   <.0001
A. balsamea vs. A. rubrum   <.0001   0.9616   <.0001   <.0001   0.1912   0.7641   <.0001
A. balsamea vs. P. tremuloides   <.0001   <.0001   <.0001   <.0001   0.0002   0.9940   <.0001
B. papyrifera vs. A. rubrum   0.9614   0.9943   0.4692   0.4829   0.0290   0.0058   <.0001
B. papyrifera vs. P. tremuloides   0.5380   <.0001   0.0698   0.5462   <.0001   0.0557   <.0001
A. rubrum vs. P. tremuloides   0.9090   <.0001   0.8613   1.0000   0.1704   0.9396   <.0001
Decay1 vs. Decay2   0.4091   0.7555   0.0937   0.1411   0.8338   1.0000   0.4971
Decay1 vs. Decay3   0.1079   0.0599   0.0002   <.0001   0.0012   0.0073   0.0003
Decay2 vs. Decay3   0.0034   0.0087   <.0001   0.0099   0.0076   0.0075   0.0140
Table A5. Mean coarse woody debris (CWD) nutrient concentrations for each decay class pooled across species/wood type with standard errors in parentheses. Carbon is presented in percent total (%) while all other nutrients are in mg kg–1. Sample sizes within each decay class are as follows: decay classes 1–3, n = 50; decay class 4, n = 20; decay class 5, n = 10. Within each row, values with similar letters are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Nutrient Decay class F-value p-value
1 2 3 4 5
C 48.6 (0.2)cd 48.8 (0.1)c 49.6 (0.2)b 52.7 (0.8)a 40.7 (2.7)d 15.06 <.0001
N 275 (73)c 199 (48)c 710 (148)c 1877 (387)b 5678 (632)a 19.69 <.0001
P 126 (8)b 108 (6)bc 101 (9)c 209 (23)a 514 (46)a 17.96 <.0001
K 1704 (143)a 1819 (185)a 1851 (266)a 1288 (293)ab 536 (42)b 5.34 0.0004
Ca 3185 (247)d 3423 (214)cd 4493 (412)bc 4865 (353)ab 6457 (547)a 9.11 <.0001
Na 26.0 (1.7)bc 24.4 (1.8)c 32.3 (2.6)b 47.1 (5.0)a 67.3 (5.5)a 14.91 <.0001
Mg 338 (16)d 394 (23)cd 515 (48)bc 597 (65)ab 694 (55)a 11.36 <.0001
Mn 69 (8)b 69 (10)b 98 (15)b 246 (29)a 288 (66)a 15.67 <.0001
Al 7.0 (1.2)c 4.8 (0.8)c 10.8 (1.5)b 83.6 (25.6)a 1074.1 (236.6)a 36.17 <.0001
B 3.4 (0.2)b 3.8 (0.3)ab 6.0 (0.7)a 5.2 (0.7)ab 5.4 (0.5)ab 3.99 0.0040
Cu 1.6 (0.1)c 1.8 (0.1)c 2.3 (0.2)b 3.9 (0.3)a 6.3 (0.7)a 28.94 <.0001
Fe 18.4 (2.8)c 14.3 (1.2)c 23.0 (3.0)b 101.6 (29.5)a 1344.6 (348.3)a 24.02 <.0001
Zn 28.2 (3.8)b 33.5 (5.8)b 43.1 (7.2)b 95.1 (17.4)a 104.0 (17.5)a 9.76 <.0001