| Table 1. Keywords used in the risk identification process. | |
| Theme | Keywords |
| Business | profitability, solvency, cost calculation, pricing, investment planning, invoicing |
| Contracts | own contractual obligations and rights, attractiveness as contract partner, partners, lack of contracts |
| Services/ products | machine manufacturers, maintenance services, insurance, financing, accounting |
| Production | work on site, planning, interruptions, waste management, theft and vandalism, logistics, transfers |
| Machines/ premises | forest machines, transfer trucks, machine halls, storage, storage of dangerous materials |
| Culture | new operational environment, attitudes of local people, adaptation to the local business environment, differences in organisational culture and behaviour |
| Entrepreneur | key person risk, own knowledge and management, work motivation, economic conditions, family, use of time |
| Personnel | preconditions for working, professional skills, traffic, work safety, welfare at work, local labour, communication, work culture, health care |
| Markets | demand, business cycle, dependency on clients, competition, clients’ solvency, payment schedules, clients’ demands |
| Policy and authorities | political stability, legislation, customs clearance, taxation, working permissions, other permissions, supervision, regional practices |
| Infrastructure | road network, phone network, IT network, sites, accommodation |
| Natural conditions | storms, frost, rainy seasons, frost heave, animals, quality of forest resources |
| Table 2. Probability of risk. | ||
| Rate | Probability | Interpretation |
| 1 | Remote | Happens once in 50 years or less frequently |
| 2 | Unlikely | At most once in 10 years |
| 3 | Possible | At most once in 5 years |
| 4 | Likely | Once in a year |
| 5 | Very likely | More than once in a year |
| Table 3. Consequences of risk. | |||
| Rate | Economic loss | Interruption of work | Personal injury |
| 0 | No loss | No interruption | No injuries |
| 1 | < €5 000 | < 2 days | Mild injury of one person |
| 2 | €5 000–€9 999 | < 1 week | Mild injury of several people |
| 3 | €10 000–€49 999 | < 1 month | Serious injury of one person (permanent injury) |
| 4 | €50 000–€99 999 | < 3 months | Serious injury of several people (permanent injury) |
| 5 | €100 000–€300 000 | < 5 months | Death of one person |
| 6 | > €300 000 | > 6 months | Death of several people |
| Table 4. Consequence/probability matrix for producing risk level. | |||||||
| Probability | Consequence | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 5 | Very likely | II | III | IV | V | V | V |
| 4 | Likely | II | III | III | IV | V | V |
| 3 | Possible | I | II | III | IV | IV | V |
| 2 | Unlikely | I | II | III | III | IV | V |
| 1 | Remote | I | I | II | III | IV | IV |
| Table 5. Action plan for risk treatment (Koneyrityksen riskienhallinta 2007). | |
| Risk severity | Action |
| 1. Trivial | Risk is so small that no action is needed |
| 2. Minor | Action is not necessarily needed Situation has to be followed to be able to control it |
| 3. Moderate | Action is needed to check or clarify the situation Action is possibly needed |
| 4. Serious | Necessary to reduce risk, but taking into account social, economic, and other aspects Action is needed |
| 5. Extreme | Removing or reducing risk is necessary regardless of costs If reducing risk is not possible, work should be forbidden permanently |
| Table 6. Possible risks for Finnish wood harvesting contractors in Russia. | |
| Theme | Risk |
| Business | Breaches of contract by client |
| Dependency on client, limited number of potential clients | |
| Low profitability of business | |
| Machines, premises, and production | Availability and professionalism of service |
| Changing production volumes make planning difficult and decrease profitability | |
| Problems in operational planning caused by interruptions in work between harvesting sites | |
| Availability of spare parts | |
| Theft of equipment and supplies | |
| Machinery and hall fires | |
| Personnel and culture | Inadequate know-how of the entrepreneur regarding Russian conditions |
| Workers’ inadequate professional skills and ability to work independently | |
| Difficulties in supervision of work due to different mindset (ideas about right and wrong, agreeing, respecting others’ property) | |
| Misunderstandings caused by interpretation of foreign language | |
| Neglecting one’s own and others’ safety | |
| Use of alcohol during work hours | |
| Markets | Sensitivity to general economic fluctuations |
| Lack of financing | |
| Underpricing competitors | |
| Policy and authorities | Non-transparent procedures of the authorities, unpredictability of the authorities (interpretation of legislation, waiting for inspections) |
| Quick and unexpected changes of laws and regulations | |
| Inflexible practice of receiving permissions | |
| Forest fires not extinguished, danger for people and machinery | |
| Infrastructure and natural conditions | Long frost heave period causing downtime |
| Roads are not ploughed in winter, no access to harvesting site | |
| Unpredictable time consumption and productivity due to the changing structure of forests | |
| Help is not available quickly in cases of sickness and injury | |

Fig. 1. Sources of common economic risk regarding payment defaults in contracting in Russia.