Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Catherine Ky-Dembele (email), Jules Bayala, Patrice Savadogo, Mulualem Tigabu, Per Christer Odén, Issaka Joseph Boussim

Comparison of growth responses of Khaya senegalensis seedlings and stecklings to four irrigation regimes

Ky-Dembele C., Bayala J., Savadogo P., Tigabu M., Odén P. C., Boussim I. J. (2010). Comparison of growth responses of Khaya senegalensis seedlings and stecklings to four irrigation regimes. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 5 article id 121. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.121

Abstract

Khaya senegalensis is an important tree species for timber production, native to West Africa, but mahogany shoot borer attacks prevent successful plantations. This research was aimed at comparing the growth of two propagule types, seedlings and stecklings, of Khaya senegalensis subjected to four irrigation regimes, 25, 50, 75 and 100% field capacity in Burkina Faso. The relative growth rate, biomass allocation and intrinsic water use efficiency of the propagules were assessed in a full-factorial pot experiment in block design. Except the relative growth rate of stem basal diameter and specific leaf area, for which mean values were significantly higher for seedlings than stecklings, the two propagule types had similar growth patterns regarding relative growth rates of stem length, leaf, stem, root and the total plant biomass. There was no significant difference between propagule types concerning biomass fraction to total plant biomass of leaf, stem and root, root to stem ratio, leaf area productivity and carbon isotope ratio (δ13C). However, the irrigation regimes significantly affected all parameters. In contrast to 75 and 100% field capacity irrigation regimes, the low water supply of 25 and 50% field capacity resulted in plant stress, which was evident from the significant reduction in plant growth and biomass production and an increase in the root biomass to total plant biomass ratio and δ13C. It can be concluded that seedlings and stecklings have comparable growth patterns, while water stress is a major growth-limiting factor highlighting the need for selecting drought and borer resistant genotypes for successful plantations.

Keywords
rooted cuttings; water stress; Senegal mahogany

Author Info
  • Ky-Dembele, Département Productions Forestières, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, 03 BP 7047 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso & Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, P.O. Box 101, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden (catherine.dembele@slu.se) E-mail kydembele@hotmail.com (email)
  • Bayala, World Agroforestry Centre, West Africa and Centre Regional Office, Sahel Node, BP E5118 Bamako, Mali E-mail jb@nn.ml
  • Savadogo, Département Productions Forestières, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, 03 BP 7047 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso & Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, P.O. Box 101, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden E-mail ps@nn.bf
  • Tigabu, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, P.O. Box 101, SE-230 53, Alnarp, Sweden E-mail mt@nn.se
  • Odén, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, P.O. Box 101, SE-230 53, Alnarp, Sweden E-mail pco@nn.se
  • Boussim, Université de Ouagadougou, Unité de Formation et Recherche en Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, 03 BP 7021, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso E-mail ijb@nn.bf

Received 6 September 2010 Accepted 19 November 2010 Published 31 December 2010

Views 2978

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.121 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Niemistö P., Korpunen H. et al. (2024) Harvesting efficiency and understory damage with.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 2 article id 23065 (remove) | Edit comment
Colakoglu G., Colak S. et al. (2003) Effect of boric acid treatment on mechanical pro.. Silva Fennica vol. 37 no. 4 article id 488 (remove) | Edit comment
Kurkela T., Aalto T. et al. (2005) Defoliation by the common pine sawfly (Diprion p.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 4 article id 360 (remove) | Edit comment
Harstela P., (1974) The influence of the change of cost level on som.. Silva Fennica vol. 8 no. 2 article id 4900 (remove) | Edit comment
Lacuna-Richman C., (2003) Ethnicity and the utilization of non-wood forest.. Silva Fennica vol. 37 no. 1 article id 516 (remove) | Edit comment
Pukkala T., Kuuluvainen T. (1987) Effect of canopy structure on the diurnal interc.. Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 3 article id 5316 (remove) | Edit comment
Nygren P., (2021) What is similarity check? Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 5 article id 10682 (remove) | Edit comment
Pisarenko A., Strakhov V. (1996) Development and utilization of Russian forest re.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5602 (remove) | Edit comment
Yu Q., (2001) Can physiological and anatomical characters be u.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 2 article id 591 (remove) | Edit comment
Julkunen E., Kuusamo A. (1987) Images of forests in patriotic songs and forest .. Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 4 article id 5325 (remove) | Edit comment
Kalela E. K., (1956) Variations of the root systems of a pine stand d.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 65 no. 1 article id 7464 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results
Ky-Dembele C., Tigabu M. et al. (2010) Clonal propagation of Detarium microcarpum from .. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 5 article id 452
Ky-Dembele C., Bayala J. et al. (2010) Comparison of growth responses of Khaya senegale.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 5 article id 121