Matti Maltamo

What does it actually mean to measure a sample plot in forest?

Maltamo M. (2023). What does it actually mean to measure a sample plot in forest? Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 4 article id 23005. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.23005

Author Info
  • Maltamo, University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Science, Forestry and Technology, Joensuu ORCID 0000-0002-9904-3371 E-mail matti.maltamo@uef.fi

Received 24 January 2023 Accepted 26 January 2023 Published 26 January 2023

Views 9980

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.23005 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0 full-model-article23005

Sample plot measurement is one of the basic operations in forest sciences. A plot is delineated and usually some forest level information is gathered. A certain minimum size in tree level measurements is often applied. Nowadays electronic devices including hypsometer and caliper are utilized when a human is measuring trees. Tally tree measurement usually include diameter at breast height (DBH), tree classifications (living or dead, tree storey, health, timber assortment) and registration of tree species. Tree height is also measured at least from chosen sample trees from which also other attributes, such as age, crown height and growth, are considered. There may be also many other measurements, but this is a basic set of information for forest resource calculation or field reference of remote sensing-based modelling of forest attributes. The purpose of a sample plot measurement may, of course, be other than determining growing stock, for example soil, ground vegetation and health to mention a few, but tree stock measurement is typically needed in those cases, too.

Recently, many remote sensing-based systems have been used in field measurements. These include, e.g., terrestrial and mobile laser scanning (TLS and MLS, respectively). Smartphone based applications, such as Trestima have also been widely applied. Even unmanned aerial vehicles has been experimented. TLS can provide highly detailed information on recognized tree trunks and crowns (Luoma 2022) – partly information, which has never been available earlier or at least these measurements have been very slow and expensive to carry out. TLS information has many different scientific uses. Correspondingly, MLS operated from a harvester will provide in the near future a completely new type of information in forest operations. Although these information sources provide detailed data, the interpretation result of these data should be considered as an accurate forest resource estimate, not a sample plot measurement. This is due to a couple of facts. In a remote sensing-based interpretation, only a proportion of trees is recognized. By applying remote sensing, it is impossible to find all trees in all type of forests. On the other hand, sample plot measurement requires measurement of all trees belonging to a stratum. Of course, some trees may be forgotten to be measured in the “traditional field work” but this refers to single cases. Another, even more serious bottleneck is tree species recognition. In Finland, remote sensing-based interpretation usually provides information on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and combined broadleaved species class. However, this information is not correct. In a sample plot measurement, species should be correctly registered. Especially in the National Forest Inventory type of measurements this refers to all species. If there is, for example, bird cherry (Prunus padus L.) in a plot, it must be registered or should be recognized. In an Austrian field data set, there were over 20 tree species (Gollob 2022). It is not possible to recognize all of them by TLS data, for example.

Despite these problems, I still see possibilities for remote sensing-based sample plot measurement. This is not my research topic, but my personal opinion is that personal laser scanning (PLS) could be a tool for that. PLS is an approach where the laser scanner is operated by a human. Sample plot measurement can be organized so that each tree in a plot is walked around (Gollob 2022). This removes the problem of tree recognition with the exception of some tree groups. During the scanning, the operator can register tree species correctly. Nowadays, there are already rather cheap tablet or smartphone-based applications of PLS. The accuracy of these devices in tree trunk dimension estimation may need to be still improved, but this an obvious step towards remote sensing-based sample plot measurement. One may still ask, what is the benefit of walking around all trees with tablet compared to traditional field work. At least the provided point clouds offer more versatile information on trees and close surroundings around them – not only the DBH.

Matti Maltamo
Editor-in-Chief

References

Gollob C (2022) Mensuration using modern sensor technology in forest inventory. Doctoral thesis. The University of Natural Resources and Life Science, Vienna, Austria.

Luoma V (2022) Measuring tree growth using terrestrial laser scanning. Dissertationes Forestales 329. https://doi.org/10.14214/df.329.


Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Kangas J., Store R. (2002) Socioecological landscape planning: an approach .. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 527 (remove) | Edit comment
Ross J., Kellomäki S. et al. (1986) Architecture of Scots pine crown. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 2 article id 5265 (remove) | Edit comment
Hakkila P., (1976) On the status of forest work science in the Finn.. Silva Fennica vol. 10 no. 1 article id 4935 (remove) | Edit comment
Hannerz M., (1994) Predicting the risk of frost occurrence after bu.. Silva Fennica vol. 28 no. 4 article id 5535 (remove) | Edit comment
Gort J., Zubizarreta Gerendiain A. et al. (2009) Differences in fibre properties in Scots pine (P.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 3 article id 193 (remove) | Edit comment
Wegelius Th., (1939) The presence and properties of knots in finnish .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 48 no. 1 article id 7346 (remove) | Edit comment
Edlund J., Bergsten U. et al. (2013) A forest machine bogie with a bearing capacity d.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 3 article id 1017 (remove) | Edit comment
Harshberger J. W., (1929) The forests of the Pacific coasts of British Col.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 34 no. 5 article id 7218 (remove) | Edit comment
Toijala V. R., (1934) Promotion and supervision of private forestry in.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 40 no. 35 article id 7312 (remove) | Edit comment
Bhat K. M., Kärkkäinen M. (1981) Variation in structure and selected properties o.. Silva Fennica vol. 15 no. 2 article id 5115 (remove) | Edit comment
Poso S., (1983) Basic features of forest inventory by compartments Silva Fennica vol. 17 no. 4 article id 5196 (remove) | Edit comment
Reitala A., (1987) Forests in Finnish art Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 4 article id 5334 (remove) | Edit comment
Simola E. J., (1937) Building and maintenance of roads Silva Fennica vol. no. 39 article id 4490 (remove) | Edit comment
Kärkkäinen M., (1978) Observations on the effect of age on the basic d.. Silva Fennica vol. 12 no. 1 article id 4989 (remove) | Edit comment
Rummukainen U., (1954) Estimation of Scots pine and Norway spruce cone .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 61 no. 20 article id 7432 (remove) | Edit comment
Vospernik S., (2006) Probability of bark stripping damage by red deer.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 4 article id 316 (remove) | Edit comment
Guignard M., (1987) The tree in the Paris and Helsinki areas. Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 4 article id 5328 (remove) | Edit comment
Saari E., (1968) The notion of reduced yield stands and forest so.. Silva Fennica vol. 2 no. 3 article id 4772 (remove) | Edit comment
Saastamoinen O., Heino J. (1976) Research topics of multiple-use forestry Silva Fennica vol. 10 no. 3 article id 4945 (remove) | Edit comment
Mikkonen E., (1983) The usefulness of some techniques of the mathema.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 183 article id 7630 (remove) | Edit comment
Ezzati S., Najafi A. et al. (2012) Recovery of soil bulk density, porosity and rutt.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 4 article id 908 (remove) | Edit comment
Kokkonen P., (1942) Observations on the soil frost of the winter 194.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 50 no. 22 article id 7375 (remove) | Edit comment
Eriksson J., Bergholm J. et al. (1981) Injury to vegetation caused by industrial emissi.. Silva Fennica vol. 15 no. 4 article id 5147 (remove) | Edit comment
Tomminen J., (1991) Pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, f.. Silva Fennica vol. 25 no. 2 article id 5447 (remove) | Edit comment
Hartikainen E., (1934) Domestic trade of saw timber in 1932 Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 40 no. 22 article id 7299 (remove) | Edit comment
Bijak S., Zasada M. et al. (2013) Estimating coarse roots biomass in young silver .. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 2 article id 963 (remove) | Edit comment
Légaré S., Bergeron Y. et al. (2002) Influence of forest composition on understory co.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 567 (remove) | Edit comment
Leikola M., (1981) Structure and development of publishing activity.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 175 article id 7622 (remove) | Edit comment
Saari E., (1954) On forest and timber balances Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 60 no. 2 article id 7409 (remove) | Edit comment
Norrlin J. P., (1923) Hawkweeds (Hieracium sp.) of Finland Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 23 no. 9 article id 7108 (remove) | Edit comment
Laitakari E., (1930) Activities of Finnish Society of Forest Sciences.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 7262 (remove) | Edit comment
Maltamo M., (2023) What does it actually mean to measure a sample p.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 4 article id 23005 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results