Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Mirja Rantala, Teppo Hujala, Mikko Kurttila (email)

Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustainability in the action of forest biodiversity cooperation networks

Rantala M., Hujala T., Kurttila M. (2012). Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustainability in the action of forest biodiversity cooperation networks. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 52. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.52

Abstract

To safeguard overall sustainability in forest resource management, the ecological, economic, social, and cultural dimensions of sustainability should all be considered. However, the socio-cultural impacts are frequently contemplated only weakly in sustainability assessments. Hitherto, attempts to operationalize socio-cultural impacts arising from economic utilization or conservation of forest resources have been perceived as vague when compared to rigorous ecological and economic indicators. One reason is that socio-cultural impacts of forest management on individuals and communities are many and by nature context- and case-specific: they need local definition, which hampers diffusion of good solutions. This study developed a multi-criteria method for measuring and monitoring socio-cultural impacts of forest resource management; the case of cooperation network projects within Forest Biodiversity Programme for Southern Finland (METSO) provided empirical data. Based on a literature review, a set of 10 criteria and 25 indicators was compiled. Cumulative utility scores, presenting networks’ contributions to socio-cultural sustainability, were generated using performance, expert evaluation and weighting data and an additive utility model. The method enables longitudinal monitoring of socio-cultural impacts, which is beneficial because outcomes are different at different time points of projects’ life cycles and some appear with a delay. The method can be used in comparing sub-utility distributions i.e. monitoring units’ performance profiles, providing valuable information for policy-makers. The multi-criteria approach and the list of socio-cultural criteria are internationally transferable to other countries and contexts such as forest bioenergy, nature tourism, watershed management, that call for analysing socio-cultural impacts of forest resource management activity on private lands.

Keywords
additive utility function; community adaptation; criteria and indicators; METSO programme

Author Info
  • Rantala, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Unit, P.O. Box 68, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail mr@nn.fi
  • Hujala, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Unit, Vantaa, Finland E-mail th@nn.fi
  • Kurttila, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Unit, P.O. Box 68, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail mikko.kurttila@metla.fi (email)

Received 30 March 2012 Accepted 4 July 2012 Published 31 December 2012

Views 8383

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.52 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Zawadzka D., Drozdowski S. et al. (2016) The availability of cavity trees along an age gr.. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 3 article id 1441 (remove) | Edit comment
Silvennoinen U., Haarlaa R. (1971) The mobility of logging tractors on snow Silva Fennica vol. 5 no. 2 article id 4843 (remove) | Edit comment
Sainio P., (1955) Winter nutrition of elk Silva Fennica vol. no. 88 article id 4647 (remove) | Edit comment
Čugunovs M., Tuittila E.-S. et al. (2017) Recovery of boreal forest soil and tree stand ch.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 5 article id 7723 (remove) | Edit comment
Franssila M., (1958) The dependence of forest fire danger on meteorol.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 67 no. 5 article id 7479 (remove) | Edit comment
Saalas U., (1934) The Finnish nomenclature of insects Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 40 no. 27 article id 7304 (remove) | Edit comment
Brooks D. J., (1986) Evaluating the regional and distributional impac.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5291 (remove) | Edit comment
Nabuurs G.-J., Schelhaas M.-J. et al. (2000) Validation of the European Forest Information Sc.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 2 article id 638 (remove) | Edit comment
Kangas J., Store R. (2002) Socioecological landscape planning: an approach .. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 527 (remove) | Edit comment
Laitakari E., (1959) The first half century of the Society of Forestr.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 70 no. 1 article id 7491 (remove) | Edit comment
Tikkanen I., (1986) Search for innovative forest policies and progra.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5281 (remove) | Edit comment
Sarvas R., (1948) Forest tree breeding Silva Fennica vol. no. 64 article id 4586 (remove) | Edit comment
Alho P., (1975) Regional differences in forest returns within Fi.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 148 article id 7582 (remove) | Edit comment
Hahtola K., (1967) Farm forestry and its socio-economic environment Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 84 no. 2 article id 7183 (remove) | Edit comment
Holopainen V., (1960) Central marketing of cellulose, with particular .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 73 no. 2 article id 7124 (remove) | Edit comment
Rousi M., (1990) Breeding forest trees for resistance to mammalia.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 210 article id 7657 (remove) | Edit comment
Kniivilä M., Saastamoinen O. (2002) The opportunity costs of forest conservation in .. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 526 (remove) | Edit comment
Rantala M., Hujala T. et al. (2012) Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustaina.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 52 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results