Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Eeva-Liisa Jukola-Sulonen (email), Maija Salemaa

A comparison of different sampling methods of quantitative vegetation analysis.

Jukola-Sulonen E.-L., Salemaa M. (1985). A comparison of different sampling methods of quantitative vegetation analysis. Silva Fennica vol. 19 no. 3 article id 5247. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15426

Abstract

Different sampling methods (the percentage cover scale, the graphical method, two-point quadrat methods, the five-, nine- and twelve-class cover scales, and the biomass harvesting) were used in estimating abundance of ground vegetation in clear-cut areas and on an abandoned field in Southern and Central Finland. The results are examined with the help of DCA ordinations. In addition, the species numbers and diversity indices obtained by different sampling methods are compared.

There were no large differences in DCA configurations between the sampling methods. According to all the sampling methods, a complex soil fertility-moisture gradient (a forest site type) was interpreted as the main ordination gradient in the vegetation data for clear-cut areas. However, different sampling methods did not give similar estimates of species numbers and diversity indices.

The PDF includes a summary in Finnish.

Keywords
clear-cutting; vegetation analysis; sampling methods; abundance of ground vegetation; species numbers; diversity indices

Published in 1985

Views 3761

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15426 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Ahtikoski A., Väätäinen K. et al. (2024) The effects of the EU’s forest-related policies .. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 3 article id 23018 (remove) | Edit comment
Laukkanen S., Palander T. et al. (2005) Evaluation of the multicriteria approval method .. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 2 article id 387 (remove) | Edit comment
Järveläinen V.-P., (1971) Some aspects concerning the use of factor analysis Silva Fennica vol. 5 no. 3 article id 4852 (remove) | Edit comment
Ring E., Högbom L. et al. (2015) Soil and soil-water chemistry below different am.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 4 article id 1265 (remove) | Edit comment
Sirén G., (1958) Experiences of brush cutters in silviculture Silva Fennica vol. no. 93 article id 4675 (remove) | Edit comment
Jääskeläinen J., Korhonen L. et al. (2024) Individual tree inventory based on uncrewed aeri.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 3 article id 23042 (remove) | Edit comment
Keipi K., (1980) Business economics in forestry research in Finla.. Silva Fennica vol. 14 no. 3 article id 5085 (remove) | Edit comment
Nylund M., Haapanen A. et al. (1979) Deterioration of forest ground vegetation and de.. Silva Fennica vol. 13 no. 4 article id 5052 (remove) | Edit comment
Korecký J., Bílý J. et al. (2017) Innovative multiplex and its evaluation for effe.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 3 article id 5644 (remove) | Edit comment
Jukola-Sulonen E.-L., Salemaa M. (1985) A comparison of different sampling methods of qu.. Silva Fennica vol. 19 no. 3 article id 5247 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results