Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Tiina Tonteri (email)

Inter-observer variation in forest vegetation cover assessments.

Tonteri T. (1990). Inter-observer variation in forest vegetation cover assessments. Silva Fennica vol. 24 no. 2 article id 5421. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15575

Abstract

Differences in vegetation cover estimation by field biologists of the 8th National Forest Inventory in Finland were tested. Eleven observers estimated the canopy coverages of six forests taxa in 25 sample plots, located in one stand. The experiment was arranged after the field work. The coverage of Vaccinium vitis-idaea and the ground layer appeared to be the most difficult to estimate. The mean of the highest estimator was about double that of the lowest one. The least abundant species and the sample plots with the smallest coverages had the largest estimation errors. The most important compositional gradient of the data was natural, even though the test was made in a homogenous area. However, the effect of the observer could be recognized. The differences between observers could be caused by the differences both in visual estimation level and in placing the sampling frame. The results suggest that tests should always be made when several observers are used in vegetation surveys. If calibration is used, it should be made separately for each species.

The PDF includes an abstract in Finnish.

Keywords
vegetation survey; forest vegetation; canopy-coverage estimation

Published in 1990

Views 5190

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15575 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Vestlund K., Nordfjell T. et al. (2005) Comparison of human and computer-based selective.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 4 article id 363 (remove) | Edit comment
Kolehmainen V. A., (1957) Vehkatallinmaa, a successful reforestation area .. Silva Fennica vol. no. 90 article id 4669 (remove) | Edit comment
Koutaniemi L., Koponen R. et al. (1988) Podzolization as studied from terraces of variou.. Silva Fennica vol. 22 no. 2 article id 5345 (remove) | Edit comment
Sironen S., Kangas A. et al. (2001) Estimating individual tree growth with the k-nea.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 4 article id 580 (remove) | Edit comment
Vehkamäki S., (1986) The economic basis of forest policy: a study on .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 194 article id 7640 (remove) | Edit comment
Purdy B. G., Macdonald S. E. et al. (2002) The regeneration niche of white spruce following.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 564 (remove) | Edit comment
Heske F., (1929) Paper on knowledge on forest zones in West-Himal.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 34 no. 30 article id 7243 (remove) | Edit comment
Tuominen S., Haapanen R. (2013) Estimation of forest biomass by means of genetic.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 1 article id 902 (remove) | Edit comment
Metsänhoitolakikomitea ., (1953) Report of the Forest Management Law Committee Silva Fennica vol. no. 83 article id 4641 (remove) | Edit comment
Zhu J., Gonda Y. et al. (2003) Modeling relative wind speed by optical stratifi.. Silva Fennica vol. 37 no. 2 article id 501 (remove) | Edit comment
Hökkä H., Penttilä T. (1999) Modelling the dynamics of wood productivity on d.. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 1 article id 668 (remove) | Edit comment
DeLong S. C., (2002) Using nature’s template to best advantage in the.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 571 (remove) | Edit comment
Ahonen L., (1970) Discount value as a basis for valuation of woodl.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 105 article id 7539 (remove) | Edit comment
Tonteri T., (1990) Inter-observer variation in forest vegetation co.. Silva Fennica vol. 24 no. 2 article id 5421 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results