Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Anssi Niskanen (email)

The financial and economic profitability of field afforestation in Finland

Niskanen A. (1999). The financial and economic profitability of field afforestation in Finland. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 2 article id 664. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.664

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the rate of return on invested capital and soil expectation value in field afforestation from the financial (business economic) and economic (national economic) point of views in Finland using 1996 cost and price data. Risks for renewal planting and negative growth impacts of reduction in plantation density were explicitly included in the profitability assessments. Results indicated that due to the subsidies and favorable regulations for obtaining them in 1996, field afforestation was financially profitable for farmers regardless of what species was used for planting. From the national economic point of view, investments in field afforestation provided only substantial return on invested capital, being highest after risk adjustments in Norway spruce (Picea abies) plantations.

Keywords
plantation; efficiency; cost-benefit-analysis; net-present-value

Author Info
  • Niskanen, European Forest Institute, Torikatu 34, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail anssi.niskanen@efi.fi (email)

Received 1 July 1998 Accepted 11 March 1999 Published 31 December 1999

Views 3455

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.664 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Manninen O. H., Peltola R. (2013) Effects of picking methods on the berry producti.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 3 article id 972 (remove) | Edit comment
Väisänen E., Hari P. et al. (1977) Annual growth level of some plant species as a f.. Silva Fennica vol. 11 no. 4 article id 4980 (remove) | Edit comment
Kaakkurivaara T., Vuorimies N. et al. (2015) Applicability of portable tools in assessing the.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 2 article id 1239 (remove) | Edit comment
Monserud R. A., Denissenko O. V. et al. (1996) Change in Siberian phytomass predicted for globa.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5586 (remove) | Edit comment
Kankare V., Luoma V. et al. (2019) Assessing feasibility of the forest trafficabili.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 3 article id 10197 (remove) | Edit comment
Uusitalo J., Kokko S. et al. (2004) The effect of two bucking methods on Scots pine .. Silva Fennica vol. 38 no. 3 article id 417 (remove) | Edit comment
Ceriani-Nakamurakare E., Ramos S. et al. (2018) Metagenomic approach of associated fungi with Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 3 article id 9940 (remove) | Edit comment
Heliövaara K., (1986) Occurrence of Petrova resinella (Lepidoptera, To.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 2 article id 5264 (remove) | Edit comment
Stenman V., Kangas A. et al. (2023) Upper stem diameter and volume prediction strate.. Silva Fennica vol. 57 no. 3 article id 23021 (remove) | Edit comment
Palosuo V. J., (1979) MERA programmes in the Finnish forestry Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 165 article id 7599 (remove) | Edit comment
Niskanen A., (1999) The financial and economic profitability of fiel.. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 2 article id 664 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results