Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Antrei Lausti, Markku Penttinen (email)

The analysis of return and its components of non-industrial private forest ownership by forestry board districts in Finland

Lausti A., Penttinen M. (1998). The analysis of return and its components of non-industrial private forest ownership by forestry board districts in Finland. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 1 article id 701. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.701


Non-industrial private forest ownership returns and risks in Finland are both estimated and disaggregated to local Forestry Board Districts (FBD) level. Additionally, the FBD level return is divided into price change, felling and change in the growing stock components, which are compared with the inflation rate. The results are based on a complete count of the stumpage prices, silvicultural costs and state subsidies as well as the National Forest Inventory (NFI) data. The influence of taxation is discussed as well. Although this database is excellent for economic studies as well, the estimation methodology is vitiated by a host of problems, the resolution of which is the major contribution of this study. The study period is 1972–1996. The results show that there have been fairly large differences in forest ownership returns and prices depending on the Forestry Board District. Results show that the price change component has been larger in Northern Forestry Board Districts, as much as 0.9% above the inflation rate in Lapland FBD, than in Southern Forestry Board Districts, 1.5% less than the inflation rate in southern Helsinki FBD. The net increase, however, has been larger in Southern Forestry Board Districts than in Northern Forestry Board Districts. Using the average net increment in Finland as a comparison base, the net increment in South Karelia exceeded it by 0.6%, but fell below it by 1.8% in Northeastern Finland. Finally, the return over the whole period is compared to the return on private housing and inflation in the case of North Savo. In all, the estimation methodology developed also serves as spin-off product development for the Forest Statistics Information Service (FSIS).

non-industrial private forests; risk; return; portfolio management; forestry board district; performance evaluation

Author Info
  • Lausti, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Centre for Doctoral Programme, Runeberginkatu 15 A, FIN-00100 Helsinki, Finland E-mail al@nn.fi
  • Penttinen, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki Research Centre, Unioninkatu 40 A, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland E-mail markku.penttinen@metla.fi (email)

Received 8 April 1997 Accepted 11 February 1998 Published 31 December 1998

Views 2794

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.701 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Hyder A. S., Lönnstedt L. et al. (1994) Outline of accounting for non-industrial private.. Silva Fennica vol. 28 no. 2 article id 5401
Penttinen M., Kinnunen M. (1992) Profitability of forestry in jointly-owned fores.. Silva Fennica vol. 26 no. 4 article id 5489
Penttinen M., (1991) Implementing forestry bookkeeping and cost accou.. Silva Fennica vol. 25 no. 2 article id 5448
Lausti A., Penttinen M. (1998) The analysis of return and its components of non.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 1 article id 701