home
focus and scope
journal policies
Focus and scope Peer review process Openness and transparency Publication frequency Archiving Article processing charges Criteria for authorship and contributors Conflicts of interest Allegations of misconduct Complaints process Sponsors Journal History
author instructions
General Metadata Article Categories Openness and transparency Submission of manuscripts Manuscript text Citation standards Tables and figures Acknowledgements, funding and availability of research materials and data Supplementary files Procedures for revised and accepted manuscripts
special issues
editors
open access
other journals
Metsätieteen aikakauskirja Dissertationes Forestales Suo - Mires and Peat
contact
financial information
Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Paula Horne (email)

Forest owners’ acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation – a choice experiment based approach

Horne P. (2006). Forest owners’ acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation – a choice experiment based approach. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 1 article id 359. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.359

Abstract

Finland has launched a new policy programme (METSO) to enhance conservation of forest biodiversity. In non-industrial private forests, the policy is based on economic incentives and voluntarism on the part of forest owners. While biodiversity conservation is the main target of the policy, social acceptability is considered to be of great importance. This study examined the factors that affect the acceptability of biodiversity conservation contracts among private forest owners, and the amount of compensation needed to keep the forest owners at least as well off as before the contract. Choice experiment method was used to analyse the data that were collected by surveying 3000 Finnish private forest owners. Analysing separately those respondents who were willing to enter into a conservation contract allowed an assessment of the impact of forest owners’ heterogeneity on compensation amount. The results show how the welfare of forest owners shifts when the contract terms are changed. In a base scenario the forest owner was assumed to be the initiator of the contract that would require only small patches of forest to be protected, and would also bind new forest owners over its duration of ten years. For all respondents, the average demand for compensation would be around 224 euros annually. When those always choosing the “no additional conservation” alternative were excluded, the average welfare impact of the base scenario was positive.

Keywords
forest owners; heterogeneity; incentive based policy mechanism; choice experiment method

Author Info
  • Horne, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Unioninkatu 40 A, FI-00170 Helsinki, Finland E-mail paula.horne@metla.fi (email)

Received 25 November 2004 Accepted 14 November 2005 Published 31 December 2006

Views 7612

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.359 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0
Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content
Export reference to EndNote / RefWorks
Related articles
Your selected articles
Send to email
Kalliokoski T., Nygren P. et al. (2008) Coarse root architecture of three boreal tree sp.. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 2 article id 252 (remove) | Edit comment
Magnussen S., Alfaro R. I. et al. (2005) Survival-time analysis of white spruce during sp.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 2 article id 382 (remove) | Edit comment
Jadwiszczak K. A., Drzymulska D. et al. (2012) Population history, genetic variation and conser.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 4 article id 905 (remove) | Edit comment
Kuusela K., (1959) Management and cutting budget problems in the Hi.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 67 no. 8 article id 7482 (remove) | Edit comment
Stener L.-G., Westin J. (2017) Early growth and phenology of hybrid aspen and p.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 3 article id 5656 (remove) | Edit comment
Luoranen J., Konttinen K. et al. (2009) Frost hardening and risk of a second flush in No.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 2 article id 209 (remove) | Edit comment
Kangas A., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2007) Modelling percentile based basal area weighted d.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 3 article id 282 (remove) | Edit comment
Rosenberg O., Jacobson S. (2004) Effects of repeated slash removal in thinned sta.. Silva Fennica vol. 38 no. 2 article id 423 (remove) | Edit comment
McKay H. M., (1998) Root electrolyte leakage and root growth potenti.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 3 article id 684 (remove) | Edit comment
Hytönen J., Jylhä P. (2005) Effects of competing vegetation and post-plantin.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 3 article id 374 (remove) | Edit comment
Lundgren C., (2004) Microfibril angle and density patterns of fertil.. Silva Fennica vol. 38 no. 1 article id 439 (remove) | Edit comment
Akbulut T., Ayrilmis N. (2006) Effect of compression wood on surface roughness .. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 1 article id 358 (remove) | Edit comment
Fraysse J. Y., Crémière L. (1998) Nursery factors influencing containerized Pinus .. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 3 article id 686 (remove) | Edit comment
Nybakk E., Crespell P. et al. (2011) Climate for innovation and innovation strategy a.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 3 article id 110 (remove) | Edit comment
Weiskittel A. R., Kenefic L. S. et al. (2009) Long-term effects of precommercial thinning on t.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 3 article id 196 (remove) | Edit comment
Rabinowitsch-Jokinen R., Vanha-Majamaa I. (2010) Immediate effects of logging, mounding and remov.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 1 article id 162 (remove) | Edit comment
Horne P., (2006) Forest owners’ acceptance of incentive based pol.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 1 article id 359 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results
Silva Fennica · Finnish Society of Forest Science