Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Iulian Dragotescu (email), Daniel D. Kneeshaw

A comparison of residual forest following fires and harvesting in boreal forests in Quebec, Canada

Dragotescu I., Kneeshaw D. D. (2012). A comparison of residual forest following fires and harvesting in boreal forests in Quebec, Canada. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 47. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.47

Abstract

Residual forests are a key component of post-burned areas creating structure within burns and providing habitat and seed sources. Yet, despite their importance to biodiversity and ecosystem processes there is little information on how similar or different residuals in burned landscape are to harvested landscapes. Our goal was to examine and compare the density, size, shape, and spatial arrangement of residual forest vegetation after fire and clearcutting. We evaluated residual forest in two locations within the boreal mixedwood region of Quebec, Canada using aerial photo interpretation and ArcGIS 9.1 software. We found residual stands to be larger and more abundant in harvested zones relative to sites affected by fire. Differences with respect to shape and spatial arrangement of residual forest were also observed among disturbance types. Factors such as proximity to watercourses, watercourse shape, and physiography affected residual abundance and spatial distribution. Residual forest in harvested zones tended to be more elongated with greater edge due to rules governing forest operations. Despite greater quantity of residual forest in harvested areas than fires, managers should still be prudent as the surrounding forest matrix is reduced in many managed landscapes.

Keywords
forest fires; biodiversity; boreal mixedwood; clearcuts; disturbances; residual forests; tree retention

Author Info
  • Dragotescu, Université du Québec à Montréal, Centre d’Étude de la Forêt (CEF), Montreal, Quebec, Canada E-mail idragot@hotmail.com (email)
  • Kneeshaw, Université du Québec à Montréal, Centre d’Étude de la Forêt (CEF), Montreal, Quebec, Canada E-mail ddk@nn.ca

Received 22 September 2011 Accepted 3 April 2012 Published 31 December 2012

Views 4699

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.47 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Tanttu A., (1915) Development of the hummocks and hummock ridges o.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 4 no. 1 article id 7533 (remove) | Edit comment
Klemola V. M., (1938) Wildlife management Silva Fennica vol. no. 46 article id 4539 (remove) | Edit comment
Koskenmaa E. J., (1951) Use of machines in construction of roads and flo.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 69 article id 4604 (remove) | Edit comment
de Lera Garrido A., Gobakken T. et al. (2022) Estimating forest attributes in airborne laser s.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 2 article id 10695 (remove) | Edit comment
Gorshkov V. V., Bakkal I. J. (1996) Species richness and structure variations of Sco.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5599 (remove) | Edit comment
Lihtonen V., (1942) Determination of felling value Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 50 no. 10 article id 7363 (remove) | Edit comment
Kangas A. S., Kangas J. (1999) Optimization bias in forest management planning .. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 4 article id 651 (remove) | Edit comment
Ruha T., Varmola M. (1997) Precommercial thinning in naturally regenerated .. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 4 article id 5635 (remove) | Edit comment
Oleksyn J., Tjoelker M. G. et al. (1998) Adaptation to changing environment in Scots pine.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 2 article id 691 (remove) | Edit comment
Maatalousväestön taloudellista asemaa selvittävä komitea ., (1957) Proceedings of the committee on economic status .. Silva Fennica vol. no. 91 article id 4670 (remove) | Edit comment
Siipilehto J., (2011) Local prediction of stand structure using linear.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 4 article id 99 (remove) | Edit comment
Finnish Society of Forest Science ., (1989) Instructions to authors Silva Fennica vol. 23 no. 1 article id 5374 (remove) | Edit comment
Hartikainen T., (1997) Late-industrial sawmill customers Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 257 article id 7518 (remove) | Edit comment
Wegelius T., (1959) Survey of forest technology research in Finland Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 70 no. 8 article id 7498 (remove) | Edit comment
Čugunovs M., Tuittila E.-S. et al. (2017) Recovery of boreal forest soil and tree stand ch.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 5 article id 7723 (remove) | Edit comment
Gendreau C., (1986) Historical considerations and evolution of the f.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5293 (remove) | Edit comment
Venäläinen M., Ruotsalainen S. (2002) Procedure for managing large-scale progeny test .. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 2 article id 539 (remove) | Edit comment
Cowan I., (2002) Fit, fitter, fittest; where does optimisation fi.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 3 article id 536 (remove) | Edit comment
Reunala A., (1987) Forest as an archetype Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 4 article id 5332 (remove) | Edit comment
Riihinen P., (1970) The forest owner and his attitudes toward forest.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 109 article id 7543 (remove) | Edit comment
Turtiainen M., Miina J. et al. (2016) Modelling the coverage and annual variation in b.. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 4 article id 1573 (remove) | Edit comment
Dragotescu I., Kneeshaw D. D. (2012) A comparison of residual forest following fires .. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 47 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results