Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Simo Hannelius (email)

Kuka on metsätilanomistaja?

Hannelius S. (1980). Kuka on metsätilanomistaja? Silva Fennica vol. 14 no. 2 article id 5075. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15016

English title: Who is the non-farmer forest owner? The semantic influence of the non-farmer forest owner-concept to research results and published statistics

Abstract

Research into the forestry behaviour of private forest owners in Finland began 10 years ago. The private forest owners have been dichotomously classified into two groups, farmers and non-farmers. The farmer forest owner was considered to derive his main income (earnings) from agriculture. This classification is compared to the concepts in statistical publication Farm Economy 1976 (Maatilatalous). On the basis of this examination, it is recommended that researchers dealing with the behaviour of private forest owners should change their classification to agree with the concepts presented in the Farm Economy statistics. The recommended concept of farmer forest owner is understood as a forest owner who has taxable net incomes (state taxation) from farming. Other private forest owners are classified as non-farmers.

The PDF includes a summary in English.

Original keywords
metsäntutkimus; metsänomistajat; yksityismetsänomistajat; metsätilat; terminologia; maanviljelijä; metsätilanomistaja; käyttäytymistutkimus

English keywords
terminology; forest owners; forest research; farmers; non-farmers; behaviour research

Published in 1980

Views 6598

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15016 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Katila P., Katila M. (2011) New paradigm for saving the world’s forests? Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 4 article id 448 (remove) | Edit comment
Harper K. A., Bergeron Y. et al. (2002) Post-fire development of canopy structure and co.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 561 (remove) | Edit comment
Mattson S., Bergsten U. et al. (2007) Pinus contorta growth in boreal Sweden as affect.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 4 article id 273 (remove) | Edit comment
Ikonen V.-P., Kellomäki S. et al. (2009) Sawn timber properties of Scots pine as affected.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 3 article id 197 (remove) | Edit comment
Saranpää P., (1983) The influence of basic density and growth ring w.. Silva Fennica vol. 17 no. 4 article id 5199 (remove) | Edit comment
Sarvas R., (1953) Instruction for the selection and registration o.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 80 article id 4638 (remove) | Edit comment
Repola J., Ahnlund Ulvcrona K. (2014) Modelling biomass of young and dense Scots pine .. Silva Fennica vol. 48 no. 5 article id 1190 (remove) | Edit comment
Omwami R. K., (1988) An economic model underlying the choice of capit.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 204 article id 7651 (remove) | Edit comment
Velling P., (1980) Variation in the density of wood of different Sc.. Silva Fennica vol. 14 no. 1 article id 5063 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results