Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Ville A.O. Selonen (email), Maija Mussaari, Tero Toivanen, Janne S. Kotiaho

The conservation potential of brook-side key habitats in managed boreal forests

Selonen V. A.O., Mussaari M., Toivanen T., Kotiaho J. S. (2011). The conservation potential of brook-side key habitats in managed boreal forests. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 5 article id 85. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.85

Abstract

Today, maintaining biodiversity is included in the targets of boreal forest management. A widespread approach in northern Europe is to identify and preserve woodland key habitats within managed forests. Woodland key habitats are expected to be patches that host populations of threatened and declining species, and the preservation of these patches is assumed to enable the persistence of the focal species in the landscape. In Finland, the criteria for selecting woodland key habitats are defined in the Finnish Forest Act, and the selection has been done by forest practitioners. Our objective was to determine whether the surroundings of boreal brooks and rivulets qualified as key habitats are truly different from brook-side habitats not granted the key habitat status, and whether the brook-side habitats of the two types differ from the forest matrix managed for timber production. We found that the two brook-side habitats were in most aspects rather alike but there was a difference in the composition of ground vegetation assemblages. In contrast, the control forests were distinct from the brook-sides in terms of dead wood, species richness and assemblages of polypores, species richness of epiphytic mosses, and the composition of beetle assemblages. We conclude that brook-sides in general provide an important habitat clearly diverging from the surrounding matrix but that the conservation value of the brook-sides granted the key habitat status may not be substantially larger than that of the brook-sides without the status.

Keywords
forest management; saproxylic species; dead wood; vegetation

Author Info
  • Selonen, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Lahti, Finland E-mail ville.selonen@juy.fi (email)
  • Mussaari, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Lahti, Finland E-mail mm@nn.fi
  • Toivanen, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Lahti, Finland E-mail tt@nn.fi
  • Kotiaho, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Lahti, Finland E-mail jsk@nn.fi

Received 29 October 2010 Accepted 13 October 2011 Published 31 December 2011

Views 2650

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.85 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Punttila P., Autio O. et al. (2016) The effects of drainage and restoration of pine .. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 2 article id 1462
Komonen A., Halme P. et al. (2014) Created substrates do not fully mimic natural su.. Silva Fennica vol. 48 no. 1 article id 980
Selonen V. A.O., Mussaari M. et al. (2011) The conservation potential of brook-side key hab.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 5 article id 85
Eräjää S., Halme P. et al. (2010) The volume and composition of dead wood on tradi.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 2 article id 150