Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Ville Kankaanhuhta (email), Timo Saksa, Heikki Smolander

Variation in the results of Norway spruce planting and Scots pine direct seeding in privately-owned forests in southern Finland

Kankaanhuhta V., Saksa T., Smolander H. (2009). Variation in the results of Norway spruce planting and Scots pine direct seeding in privately-owned forests in southern Finland. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 1 article id 217. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.217

Abstract

This study describes the variation in the planting results for 3-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and 4-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) using direct seeding in privately-owned regeneration areas in southern Finland. The study material consists of operative forest regeneration quality management inventory areas from the years 2000–2006. The effect of both the regional and the administrative levels as well as ecological factors was modelled on the basis of the hierarchy structure forestry centre, Forest Owners’ Association (= FOA), forestry professional, regeneration area and sample plot. The major part of the variation occurred at the sample plot and regeneration area level. Particular attention was paid to observation of the clustered spatial distribution of Scots pine seedlings. The FOA and forestry professional levels explained 5% of the variation in Norway spruce planting and 11% of the variation in Scots pine direct seeding. Applied forest regeneration operations, site and soil characteristics were included in the fixed effects. In the planting of Norway spruce the most important factor explaining the regeneration result was soil preparation. Mounding produced better results than patching and disc trenching. The site and soil characteristics were other important factors in the operations. The selection of direct seeding of Scots pine on too fertile, fine textured or moist sites yielded poor results.

Keywords
Pinus sylvestris; Picea abies; quality control; forest regeneration survey; forest regeneration inventory; quality management

Author Info
  • Kankaanhuhta, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research Unit, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland E-mail ville.kankaanhuhta@metla.fi (email)
  • Saksa, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research Unit, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland E-mail ts@nn.fi
  • Smolander, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research Unit, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland E-mail hs@nn.fi

Received 10 September 2008 Accepted 30 January 2009 Published 31 December 2009

Views 2776

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.217 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Laine T., Kankaanhuhta V. et al. (2020) Effects of spot mounding and inverting on growth.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 5 article id 10369
Haataja L., Kankaanhuhta V. et al. (2018) Reliability of self-control method in the manage.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 1 article id 1665
Hallongren H., Kankaanhuhta V. et al. (2016) Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechani.. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 3 article id 1514
Kankaanhuhta V., Saksa T. et al. (2010) The effect of quality management on forest regen.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 2 article id 157
Kankaanhuhta V., Saksa T. et al. (2009) Variation in the results of Norway spruce planti.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 1 article id 217