Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Claude Vidal (email), Adrian Lanz, Erkki Tomppo, Klemens Schadauer, Thomas Gschwantner, Lucio di Cosmo, Nicolas Robert

Establishing forest inventory reference definitions for forest and growing stock: a study towards common reporting

Vidal C., Lanz A., Tomppo E., Schadauer K., Gschwantner T., di Cosmo L., Robert N. (2008). Establishing forest inventory reference definitions for forest and growing stock: a study towards common reporting. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 2 article id 255. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.255


International agreements such as the Kyoto protocol and Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), as well as, criteria and indicator processes require reports on the status of nations’ forests. Any comparison of the current status and trends of forest resources among nations presumes that the nations’ applied definitions and concepts produce comparable estimates of the status of forests. In spite of this, the FAO has already collected global information for 60 years and made noticeable efforts in creating common definitions, but forest related data are still collected using diverse definitions, even regarding basic concepts such as forest and forest area. A simple consequence is that the cross-countries estimates are not comparable. The reasons behind the differences in the definitions are diverse histories, and sometimes different use of forests. In an ideal case, national forest inventories should fulfil both national and international needs. In addition to the FAO’s Forest Resources Assessment process, other efforts are made to assess the status of forests in European countries, e.g. European Forest Information and Communication System (EFICS). EFICS produced reports about forest inventories but does not suggest any common definition or method to convert estimates from one definition to another one. This article presents principles and methods to create commonly acceptable and adoptable definitions for forest inventories. The principles and methods are demonstrated using two examples: the reference definitions of forest and growing stock. The article is based on the work of COST Action E43 (http://www.metla.fi/eu/cost/e43/).

national forest inventories; reference definitions; growing stock; harmonisation; analytical decomposition

Author Info
  • Vidal, Inventaire Forestier National, Château des Barres, Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France E-mail claude.vidal@ifn.fr (email)
  • Lanz, WSL/FNP, Abteilung Landschaftsinventuren, Birmensdorf, Switzerland E-mail al@nn.ch
  • Tomppo, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Unit, Vantaa, Finland E-mail et@nn.fi
  • Schadauer, Bundesamt und Forschungszentrum für Wald, Wien, Austria E-mail ks@nn.at
  • Gschwantner, Bundesamt und Forschungszentrum für Wald, Wien, Austria E-mail tg@nn.at
  • di Cosmo, ISAFA, Villazzano, Italy E-mail ldc@nn.it
  • Robert, Inventaire Forestier National, Ch‰teau des Barres, Nogent-sur-Vernisson, France E-mail nr@nn.fr

Received 10 August 2007 Accepted 11 January 2008 Published 31 December 2008

Views 5085

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.255 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Vidal C., Lanz A. et al. (2008) Establishing forest inventory reference definiti.. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 2 article id 255
Gschwantner T., Schadauer K. et al. (2009) Common tree definitions for national forest inve.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 2 article id 463