Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Jouni Siipilehto (email), Sakari Sarkkola, Lauri Mehtätalo

Comparing regression estimation techniques when predicting diameter distributions of Scots pine on drained peatlands

Siipilehto J., Sarkkola S., Mehtätalo L. (2007). Comparing regression estimation techniques when predicting diameter distributions of Scots pine on drained peatlands. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 2 article id 300. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.300


We compared different statistical methods for fitting linear regression models to a longitudinal data of breast height diameter (dbh) distributions of Scots pine dominated stands on drained peatlands. The parameter prediction methods for two parameters of Johnson’s SB distribution, fitted to basal-area dbh distributions, were: 1) a linear model estimated by ordinary least squares (OLS), 2) a multivariate linear model estimated using the seemingly unrelated regression approach (SUR), 3) a linear mixed-effects model with random intercept (MIX), and 4) a multivariate mixed-effects model (MSUR). The aim was to clarify the effect of taking into account the hierarchy of the data, as well as simultaneous estimation of the correlated dependent variables on the model fit and predictions. Instead of the reliability of the predicted parameters, we focused on the reliability of the models in predicting stand conditions. Predicted distributions were validated in terms of bias, RMSE, and error deviation in the generated quantities of the growing stock. The study material consisted of 112 successively measured stands from 12 experimental areas covering the whole of Finland (total of 608 observations). Two independent test data sets were used for model validation. All the advanced regression techniques were superior to OLS, when exactly the same independent stand variables were included. SUR and MSUR were ranked the overall best and second best, respectively. Their ranking was the same in the modeling data, whereas MSUR was superior in the peatland test data and SUR in the mineral soil test data. The ranking of the models was logical, but may not be widely generalized. The SUR and MSUR models were considered to be relevant tools for practical forest management planning purposes over a variety of site types and stand structures.

Pinus sylvestris; drained peatland; dbh distribution; Johnson’s SB function; regression estimation methods

Author Info
  • Siipilehto, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Unit, P.O. Box 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland E-mail jouni.siipilehto@metla.fi (email)
  • Sarkkola, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Unit, P.O. Box 18, FI-01301 Vantaa, Finland E-mail ss@nn.fi
  • Mehtätalo, University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, P.O. Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail lm@nn.fi

Received 7 June 2006 Accepted 8 February 2007 Published 31 December 2007

Views 2284

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.300 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Siipilehto J., Lyly O. (1995) Weed control trials with fibre mulch, glyphosate.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 1 article id 5545
Lee D., Siipilehto J. et al. (2021) Models for diameter distribution and tree height.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 5 article id 10612
Siipilehto J., Mäkinen H. et al. (2021) Models for integrating and identifying the effec.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 2 article id 10496
Siipilehto J., Allen M. et al. (2020) Stand-level mortality models for Nordic boreal f.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 5 article id 10414
Siipilehto J., Rajala M. (2019) Model for diameter distribution from assortments.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 1 article id 10062
Siipilehto J., Lindeman H. et al. (2016) Reliability of the predicted stand structure for.. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 3 article id 1568
Siipilehto J., Mehtätalo L. (2013) Parameter recovery vs. parameter prediction for .. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 4 article id 1057
Siipilehto J., (2011) Local prediction of stand structure using linear.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 4 article id 99
Siipilehto J., Sarkkola S. et al. (2007) Comparing regression estimation techniques when .. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 2 article id 300
Siipilehto J., (2006) Linear prediction application for modelling the .. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 334
Siipilehto J., (2006) Height distributions of Scots pine sapling stand.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 331
Siipilehto J., Siitonen J. (2004) Degree of previous cutting in explaining the dif.. Silva Fennica vol. 38 no. 4 article id 410
Siipilehto J., (2001) Effect of weed control with fibre mulches and he.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 4 article id 577
Siipilehto J., (2000) A comparison of two parameter prediction methods.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 617
Siipilehto J., (1999) Improving the accuracy of predicted basal-area d.. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 4 article id 650