Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Simo Poso (email), Mark-Leo Waite

Calculation and comparison of different permanent sample plot types .

Poso S., Waite M.-L. (1995). Calculation and comparison of different permanent sample plot types . Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5554. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9205

Abstract

A calculation procedure is presented for calculating and analysing remeasured permanent sample plots. Data for eight different fixed and variable size plot types were simulated on the basis of two stands whose trees were mapped and measured in 1982 and 1986. The accuracy and efficiency of the plot types were assessed and compared.

The calculation procedure is based on tree-wise expansion factors and the division of tree sampled into state/measurement classes. Nine classes were required for variable size plots and six for fixed size plots. A relascope plot with basal-area factor 1 (m2/ha) proved to be most efficient for estimating basal-area at a given time and a fixed size circular plot with radius 10 m for estimating basal-area increment over a given time period.

The main problems were related to the estimation of non-measurable variables, e.g., the initial diameters of ingrowth trees, i.e., trees having passed the threshold size during the measurement period. Most problematic were cut trees belonging to the ingrowth or sample enlargement classes. It is nevertheless thought that the system is appropriate for monitoring forest changes and making sensitivity analyses with permanent sample plots.

Keywords
forest inventories; forest monitoring; sampling; optimum sampling unit; permanent plot analysis

Published in 1995

Views 4595

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9205 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Leinonen I., Hänninen H. et al. (1996) Testing of frost hardiness models for Pinus sylv.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5583 (remove) | Edit comment
Ahnlund Ulvcrona K., Bergström D. et al. (2017) Stand structure after thinning in 1–2 m wide cor.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 3 article id 1563 (remove) | Edit comment
Kellomäki S., Hänninen H. et al. (1992) A simulation model for the succession of the bor.. Silva Fennica vol. 26 no. 1 article id 5468 (remove) | Edit comment
Lassila I., (1934) Durability as indication of wood quality Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 40 no. 32 article id 7309 (remove) | Edit comment
Keltikangas M., Laine J. et al. (1986) Peatlands drained for forestry during 1930–1978:.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 193 article id 7639 (remove) | Edit comment
Poso S., Waite M.-L. (1995) Calculation and comparison of different permanen.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5554 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results