Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Simo Poso (email), Mark-Leo Waite

Calculation and comparison of different permanent sample plot types .

Poso S., Waite M.-L. (1995). Calculation and comparison of different permanent sample plot types . Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5554. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9205

Abstract

A calculation procedure is presented for calculating and analysing remeasured permanent sample plots. Data for eight different fixed and variable size plot types were simulated on the basis of two stands whose trees were mapped and measured in 1982 and 1986. The accuracy and efficiency of the plot types were assessed and compared.

The calculation procedure is based on tree-wise expansion factors and the division of tree sampled into state/measurement classes. Nine classes were required for variable size plots and six for fixed size plots. A relascope plot with basal-area factor 1 (m2/ha) proved to be most efficient for estimating basal-area at a given time and a fixed size circular plot with radius 10 m for estimating basal-area increment over a given time period.

The main problems were related to the estimation of non-measurable variables, e.g., the initial diameters of ingrowth trees, i.e., trees having passed the threshold size during the measurement period. Most problematic were cut trees belonging to the ingrowth or sample enlargement classes. It is nevertheless thought that the system is appropriate for monitoring forest changes and making sensitivity analyses with permanent sample plots.

Keywords
forest inventories; forest monitoring; sampling; optimum sampling unit; permanent plot analysis

Published in 1995

Views 4178

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9205 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Runeckles V. C., Palmer K. T. et al. (1981) Effects of field exposures to SO2 on Douglas fir.. Silva Fennica vol. 15 no. 4 article id 5137 (remove) | Edit comment
Kärhä K., Oinas S. (1998) Satisfaction and company loyalty as expressed by.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 1 article id 698 (remove) | Edit comment
Skrøppa T., (1994) Impacts of tree improvement on genetic structure.. Silva Fennica vol. 28 no. 4 article id 5539 (remove) | Edit comment
Kellomäki S., Hari P. et al. (1977) Annual production of some forest mosses as a fun.. Silva Fennica vol. 11 no. 1 article id 4964 (remove) | Edit comment
Palander T., (1997) A local DLP-GIS-LP system for geographically dec.. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 2 article id 5617 (remove) | Edit comment
Sierla V. O., Arvela J. J. (1953) Practical training of applicants of forest schoo.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 80 article id 4632 (remove) | Edit comment
Jokinen P., (1939) Observations on settlement in the state forests .. Silva Fennica vol. no. 49 article id 4570 (remove) | Edit comment
Wegelius T., (1959) Survey of forest technology research in Finland Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 70 no. 7 article id 7497 (remove) | Edit comment
Nisula P., (1968) A proposal for the determination of total volume.. Silva Fennica vol. 2 no. 1 article id 4761 (remove) | Edit comment
Kantola M., Harstela P. (1993) The basic terminology of timber harvesting in Fi.. Silva Fennica vol. 27 no. 1 article id 5500 (remove) | Edit comment
Päätalo M.-L., (1998) Factors influencing occurrence and impacts of fi.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 2 article id 695 (remove) | Edit comment
Arola V. A., (1939) National Pensions Act and withholding of salary Silva Fennica vol. no. 52 article id 4550 (remove) | Edit comment
Poso S., Waite M.-L. (1995) Calculation and comparison of different permanen.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5554 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results