Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Simo Poso (email), Mark-Leo Waite

Calculation and comparison of different permanent sample plot types .

Poso S., Waite M.-L. (1995). Calculation and comparison of different permanent sample plot types . Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5554. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9205


A calculation procedure is presented for calculating and analysing remeasured permanent sample plots. Data for eight different fixed and variable size plot types were simulated on the basis of two stands whose trees were mapped and measured in 1982 and 1986. The accuracy and efficiency of the plot types were assessed and compared.

The calculation procedure is based on tree-wise expansion factors and the division of tree sampled into state/measurement classes. Nine classes were required for variable size plots and six for fixed size plots. A relascope plot with basal-area factor 1 (m2/ha) proved to be most efficient for estimating basal-area at a given time and a fixed size circular plot with radius 10 m for estimating basal-area increment over a given time period.

The main problems were related to the estimation of non-measurable variables, e.g., the initial diameters of ingrowth trees, i.e., trees having passed the threshold size during the measurement period. Most problematic were cut trees belonging to the ingrowth or sample enlargement classes. It is nevertheless thought that the system is appropriate for monitoring forest changes and making sensitivity analyses with permanent sample plots.

forest inventories; forest monitoring; sampling; optimum sampling unit; permanent plot analysis

Published in 1995

Views 1891

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9205 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Poso S., Waite M.-L. (1995) Calculation and comparison of different permanen.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5554
Poso S., Paananen R. et al. (1987) Forest inventory by compartments using satellite.. Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 1 article id 5307
Poso S., Häme T. et al. (1984) A method for estimating the stand characteristic.. Silva Fennica vol. 18 no. 3 article id 5219
Poso S., (1983) Basic features of forest inventory by compartments Silva Fennica vol. 17 no. 4 article id 5196
Nyyssönen A., Poso S. (1962) Tree stand classifications from aerial photograp.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 112 article id 4705
Nyyssönen A., Poso S. et al. (1968) The use of aerial photographs in the estimation .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 82 no. 4 article id 7177
Tuominen S., Poso S. (2001) Improving multi-source forest inventory by weigh.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 2 article id 596
Poso S., Wang G. et al. (1999) Weighting alternative estimates when using multi.. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 1 article id 669
Wang G., Poso S. et al. (1998) The use of digitized aerial photographs and loca.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 3 article id 682