Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Tapio Rantala (email)

Democratic legitimacy of the forest sector and nature conservation decision-making in Finnish print media discussion

Rantala T. (2011). Democratic legitimacy of the forest sector and nature conservation decision-making in Finnish print media discussion. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 1 article id 35. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.35

Abstract

The study explores perceived democratic legitimacy of forest-related decision-making processes in the Finnish print media discourse. The data consists of the readers’ letters in four journals (n = 530), and the comments given during the preparation of the Finnish National Forest Program (n = 140). The objective is to identify the patterns of democratic legitimacy and respective performance evaluations of actual decision-making processes. The patterns can be classified as support for: (A) democracy and other forms of government, (B) different forms of participation, and (C) principles of democracy. The principles can be further classified into 1) core regime, 2) input, 3) throughput, and 4) output principles. Democratic legitimacy was found to be an important source of legitimacy in the public discussion since democratic patterns were found in more than half of the texts. The most common core legitimacy principles included freedom of speech, good national and international standing, forerunnership, and legality at national and international level. The central principles related to input legitimacy included popular sovereignty, a voice for the people, popular participation, openness, presenting alternatives, and urgency. The consensus and majority rules were found to be the most prominent throughput principles. Democratic output legitimacy included accountability, responsibility, cooperation, commitment, responsiveness, the possibility to appeal, credibility, comprehensiveness, and understandability. The findings suggest that among the writers of readers’ letters there is less contestation regarding the principles of democratic legitimacy but there are significant disagreements concerning the performance of decision-making processes. The negative performance evaluations were two times more frequent than the positive evaluations.

Keywords
legitimacy; democracy; policy evaluation; forest policy; nature conservation policy; national forest program; nature conservation program

Author Info
  • Rantala, Department of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail tapio.rantala@helsinki.fi (email)

Received 11 May 2010 Accepted 28 December 2010 Published 31 December 2011

Views 4021

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.35 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Pukkala T., Kangas J. et al. (1997) Integrating forest-level and compartment-level i.. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 4 article id 5636
Dudley N., Jeanrenaud J.-P. et al. (1996) Conservation in boreal forests under conditions .. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5604
Koch N. E., (1993) Outlines of environmental policy concerning fore.. Silva Fennica vol. 27 no. 1 article id 5499
Wermann E., (1993) Outlooks of forestry in the European Community w.. Silva Fennica vol. 27 no. 1 article id 5498
Metz A.-M., (1986) Influence of forest owners as an interest group .. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5285
Schmithüsen F., (1986) The changing role of legislation related to fore.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5282
Tikkanen I., (1986) Analysis and evaluation of public forest policies. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5279
Leikola M., (1979) The role of forestry in guiding forest policy an.. Silva Fennica vol. 13 no. 1A article id 5013
Mikola P., (1970) The role of forestry and forest industries in co.. Silva Fennica vol. 4 no. 3 article id 4824
Jalas J., (1953) Vegetation and flora in the planned national par.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 81 article id 4640
Luonnon- ja kansallispuistokomitea ., (1953) Establishment of new nature parks and national p.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 79 article id 4639
Kujala V., (1939) Nature conservation Silva Fennica vol. no. 52 article id 4553
Riihinen P., (1963) Economic models underlying forest policy program.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 75 no. 5 article id 7139
Söyrinki N., Salmela R. et al. (1977) The forest and mire vegetation of the Oulanka Na.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 154 article id 7588
Palo M., (1974) Goal-setting for Finnish forest research policy .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 142 article id 7576
Kilkki P., Väisänen U. (1969) Determination of the optimum cutting policy for .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 102 article id 7613
Jåstad E. O., Nagel N. O. et al. (2023) The location and capacity-dependent price impact.. Silva Fennica vol. 57 no. 1 article id 23001
Janse G., (2007) Characteristics and challenges of forest sector .. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 4 article id 279
Horne P., (2006) Forest owners’ acceptance of incentive based pol.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 1 article id 359
Rouvinen S., Rautiainen A. et al. (2005) A relation between historical forest use and cur.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 1 article id 393
Uliczka H., (2003) Nature conservation efforts by forest owners – i.. Silva Fennica vol. 37 no. 4 article id 485
Kniivilä M., Saastamoinen O. (2002) The opportunity costs of forest conservation in .. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 526
Linder P., Jonsson P. et al. (1998) Tree mortality after prescribed burning in an ol.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 4 article id 675