Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Lauri Korhonen (email), Kari T. Korhonen, Miina Rautiainen, Pauline Stenberg

Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques

Korhonen L., Korhonen K. T., Rautiainen M., Stenberg P. (2006). Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 4 article id 315. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.315

Abstract

Estimation of forest canopy cover has recently been included in many forest inventory programmes. In this study, after discussing how canopy cover is defined, different ground-based canopy cover estimation techniques are compared to determine which would be the most feasible for a large scale forest inventory. Canopy cover was estimated in 19 Scots pine or Norway spruce dominated plots using the Cajanus tube, line intersect sampling, modified spherical densiometer, digital photographs, and ocular estimation. The comparisons were based on the differences in values acquired with selected techniques and control values acquired with the Cajanus tube. The statistical significance of the differences between the techniques was tested with the nonparametric Kruskall-Wallis analysis of variance and multiple comparisons. The results indicate that different techniques yield considerably different canopy cover estimates. In general, labour intensive techniques (the Cajanus tube, line intersect sampling) provide unbiased and more precise estimates, whereas the estimates provided by fast techniques (digital photographs, ocular estimation) have larger variances and may also be seriously biased.

Keywords
canopy cover; forest canopy; canopy closure; Cajanus tube; line intersect sampling; spherical densiometer; digital photographs

Author Info
  • Korhonen, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail lauri.korhonen@joensuu.fi (email)
  • Korhonen, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail ktk@nn.fi
  • Rautiainen, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail mr@nn.fi
  • Stenberg, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail ps@nn.fi

Received 12 April 2006 Accepted 26 September 2006 Published 31 December 2006

Views 4167

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.315 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Hardenbol A. A., Kuzmin A. et al. (2021) Detection of aspen in conifer-dominated boreal f.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 4 article id 10515
Kukkonen M., Kotivuori E. et al. (2021) Volumes by tree species can be predicted using p.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 1 article id 10360
Korhonen L., Repola J. et al. (2019) Transferability and calibration of airborne lase.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 3 article id 10179
Kotivuori E., Korhonen L. et al. (2016) Nationwide airborne laser scanning based models .. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 4 article id 1567
Korhonen L., Ali-Sisto D. et al. (2015) Tropical forest canopy cover estimation using sa.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 5 article id 1405
Gobakken T., Korhonen L. et al. (2013) Laser-assisted selection of field plots for an a.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 5 article id 943
Korhonen L., Pippuri I. et al. (2013) Detection of the need for seedling stand tending.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 2 article id 952
Korhonen L., Korhonen K. T. et al. (2007) Local models for forest canopy cover with beta r.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 4 article id 275
Korhonen L., Korhonen K. T. et al. (2006) Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison .. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 4 article id 315