Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Jari Parviainen (email)

Tasks of forest biodiversity management and monitoring deriving from international agreements.

Parviainen J. (1996). Tasks of forest biodiversity management and monitoring deriving from international agreements. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5603. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9248

Abstract

Four governmental efforts are underway to reach consensus on indicators of sustainable forestry. Through the Helsinki process, European countries have developed and reached a pan-European, binding consensus, The Montreal process includes non-European Temperate and boreal forest countries, the International Tropical Timber Organization (lTTO) have developed guidelines for the sustainable management of natural tropical forests, and the countries around the Amazon basis have developed a joint initiative for creating guidelines of sustainable forest management of the Amazonian tropical rain forests. It is estimated that as many as 15–20 distinct processes are under way in the private sector by non-profit organizations and for-profit companies, some domestic and other international in scope. Perhaps the most wide-ranging definition work of non-governmental organizations is the undertake by the Forest Stewardship Council, FSC. The paper discusses the Helsinki and Montreal processes and the tasks for research.

Keywords
forest management; biodiversity; forest protection; sustainable forestry; international agreements; criteria of sustainability; Helsinki process; Montreal process

Published in 1996

Views 1784

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9248 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Peltonen M., Heliövaara K. et al. (1997) Forest insects and environmental variation in st.. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 2 article id 5613
Henly R. K., Ellefson P. V. (1986) Cost and effectiveness of legal mandates for the.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5296
Pesonen M., (1995) Non-industrial private forest landowners’ choice.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 247 article id 7509
Mazziotta A., Podkopaev D. et al. (2017) Quantifying and resolving conservation conflicts.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 1 article id 1778
Nordström E.-M., Holmström H. et al. (2013) Evaluating continuous cover forestry based on th.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 4 article id 1046
Rantala M., Hujala T. et al. (2012) Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustaina.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 52
Angelstam P., Andersson K. et al. (2011) Protecting forest areas for biodiversity in Swed.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 5 article id 90
Légaré J.-P., Hébert C. et al. (2011) Alternative silvicultural practices in irregular.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 5 article id 79
Lindstad B. H., Solberg B. (2010) Assessing national compliance with international.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 1 article id 167
Marjokorpi A., Salo J. (2007) Operational standards and guidelines for biodive.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 2 article id 297
Veijalainen A.-M., Juntunen M.-L. et al. (2007) Forest nursery waste composting in windrows with.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 1 article id 305
Tange A. C., Sjølie H. K. et al. (2024) Effectiveness of conservation measures to suppor.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 2 article id 23057
Bergeron Y., Leduc A. et al. (2002) Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable man.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 553
DeLong S. C., (2002) Using nature’s template to best advantage in the.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 571