Erik Arvidsson, Anders Rowell, Linnea Hansson, Håkan Lideskog, Mikael Rönnqvist. (2026). Comparison of manual and automated coverage path planning for mechanized forest regeneration. Silva Fennica vol. 60 no. 1 article id 25018. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.25018

Keywords: site preparation; planting; mechanization; automation; precision forestry; routing

Highlights: Automated coverage path planners TerraTrail and Pathfinder outperform manual operators driving the PlantMax planting machine in coverage across all test sites; Pathfinder demonstrated the shortest path lengths, especially in constrained environments, with up to 14% shorter paths compared to manual planning; The study emphasizes the potential of autonomous path planning systems to reduce labor dependency, enhance sustainability, and improve the efficiency of forest regeneration operations; The automated planners effectively accounted for vehicle constraints such as terrain and soil moisture conditions, optimizing routes for more efficient regeneration.

Abstract | Full text in HTML | Full text in PDF | Author Info

In Finland and Scandinavia, even-aged forest management predominates, often including mechanical site preparation and manual planting. Growing labor shortages and increased demand for sustainability have driven interest in mechanized and autonomous planting systems. This study evaluates two automated Coverage Path Planners (CPP), Pathfinder and TerraTrail, developed to optimize planting routes for mechanized forest regeneration. Their performance is compared to the routes of the manually operated mechanized planting machine, PlantMax. Three operational sites in Sweden, representing varied terrain and hydrological conditions are evaluated. The evaluation focuses on coverage, Euclidean and Dubins path lengths. Both CPPs incorporate Digital Elevation Models (DEM), Depth-to-Water (DTW) maps and vehicle-specific kinematics to generate planting routes. Two scenarios are evaluated: one where the CPPs neglect the DTW map, and another where the CPPs are constrained to avoid DTW values below 0.3 m. Results show that automated CPPs achieve 15–19% higher coverage than manual planning on average. Pathfinder showed similar normalized path lengths in an unconstrained scenario as the manual operator, but 14% shorter in the constrained environment. TerraTrail shows 7% longer normalized path lengths in an unconstrained scenario, while the constrained scenario shows similar path lengths as the manual operator. These findings emphasize the potential of deploying automated CPP systems to enhance precision, sustainability, and labor efficiency of silvicultural operations. The CPPs support both autonomous deployment and decision support tool for operators. Further refinement, including combining both CPPs to leverage the best functions of each, along with reversible path planning, could enhance their value in forestry practices.

Arvidsson, Luleå University of Technology (LTU), SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7679-0203 E-mail: erik.arvidsson@ltu.se
Rowell, Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (Skogforsk), Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 83 Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2810-1434 E-mail: anders.rowell@skogforsk.se
Hansson, Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (Skogforsk), Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 83 Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-1734 E-mail: linnea.hansson@skogforsk.se
Lideskog, Luleå University of Technology (LTU), SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-828X E-mail: hakan.lideskog@ltu.se
Rönnqvist, Université Laval, 1065, avenue de la Médecine, Local 1504, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1940-6129 E-mail: mikael.ronnqvist@gmc.ulaval.ca

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.

If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.

Contents alert

Your selected articles

Follow @SilvaFennica