Ursula Schatz, Henrik Heräjärvi, Kari Kannisto, Matti Rantatalo. (2008). Influence of saw and secateur pruning on stem discolouration, wound cicatrisation and diameter growth of Betula pendula. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 2 article id 258. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.258

Keywords: Betula pendula; colour defects; pruning saw; secateur; technical quality

Abstract | View details | Full text in PDF | Author Info

The aim of this case study was to compare the impacts of saw and secateur pruning on silver birch (Betula pendula Roth). Data were collected from two saw pruned stands in 2005, and one secateur pruned stand in 2003. All the stands were located in southern Finland. The sample stems were felled, and their butt logs were sawn into flitches, whose knot features and colour defects were measured. In addition, discs were sawn from each stem in order to study the annual ring widths. In this material, pruning with secateurs appeared to cause less colour defects than pruning with a saw. Irrespective of the pruning method used, the colour defects in the stem wood were at their largest in cases where the basal knob or the stem bark appeared to be damaged by pruning. Colour defects spread mainly towards the pith, only in a few cases towards the stem surface. The cicatrisation time of the knots as well as the length of the bark stick remaining inside the stem did not show significant differences between the two pruning methods. Pruning of the lowest living branches appears to have no effect on the diameter growth of silver birch trees.

Schatz, Peltotievantie 27, FI-99440 Leppäjärvi, Finland E-mail: us@nn.fin
Heräjärvi, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Research Unit, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: henrik.herajarvi@metla.fi
Kannisto, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Parkano Research Unit, Kaironiementie 54, FI-39700 Parkano, Finland E-mail: kk@nn.fi
Rantatalo, Peltotievantie 27, FI-99440 Leppäjärvi, Finland E-mail: mr@nn.fi

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.

If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.

Contents alert

Your selected articles
Send to email

Pykäläinen J., (2000) Defining forest owner’s forest-management goals .. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 1 article id 644 (remove) | Edit comment

Johansson T., (1999) Biomass production of Norway spruce (Picea abies.. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 4 article id 649 (remove) | Edit comment

Larjavaara M., Muller-Landau H. C. (2011) Cross-section mass: an improved basis for woody .. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 2 article id 119 (remove) | Edit comment

Siipilehto J., (2011) Local prediction of stand structure using linear.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 4 article id 99 (remove) | Edit comment

Kuusipalo J., Berg M.-A. et al. (1989) A cross-sectional population survey on the consu.. Silva Fennica vol. 23 no. 1 article id 5372 (remove) | Edit comment

Poso S., Paananen R. et al. (1987) Forest inventory by compartments using satellite.. Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 1 article id 5307 (remove) | Edit comment

Cajander A. K., (1923) What do the forest types stand for? Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 25 no. 4 article id 7079 (remove) | Edit comment

Nieppola J., (1993) Site classification in Pinus sylvestris L. fores.. Silva Fennica vol. 27 no. 1 article id 5494 (remove) | Edit comment

Johansson T., (1996) Site index curves for European aspen (Populus tr.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 4 article id 5568 (remove) | Edit comment

Cajander A. K., (1930) Characters and meaning of forest types Silva Fennica vol. no. 15 article id 4456 (remove) | Edit comment

Hiltunen V., Kurttila M. et al. (2012) Strengthening top-level guidance in geographical.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 4 article id 909 (remove) | Edit comment

Terhonen E., Kujala S. et al. (2025) Genetic variation of resistance in Scots pine as.. Silva Fennica vol. 59 no. 2 article id 25028 (remove) | Edit comment

Follow @SilvaFennica