Current issue: 60(3)

Scopus CiteScore 2023: 3.5
Scopus ranking of open access forestry journals: 17th
PlanS compliant
Select issue
Silva Fennica 1926-1997
1990-1997
1980-1989
1970-1979
1960-1969
Acta Forestalia Fennica
1953-1968
1933-1952
1913-1932

Articles containing the keyword 'Nelder-Mead method'

Category : Research article

article id 211, category Research article
Timo Pukkala. (2009). Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 2 article id 211. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.211
Keywords: Particle Swarm Optimization; differential evolution; evolution strategy; Nelder-Mead method; amoeba search; polytope search; evolutionary computing
Abstract | View details | Full text in PDF | Author Info
In Finland, the growth and yield models for tree stands are simulation programs that consist of several sub-models. These models are often non-smooth and non-differentiable. Direct search methods such as the Hooke-Jeeves algorithm (HJ) are suitable tools for optimizing stand management with this kind of complicated models. This study tested a new class of direct search methods, namely population-based methods, in the optimization of stand management. The tested methods were differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, evolution strategy, and the Nelder-Mead method. All these methods operate with a population of solution vectors, which are recombined and mutated to obtain new candidate solutions. The management schedule of 719 stands was optimized with all population-based methods and with the HJ method. The population-based methods were competitive with the HJ method, producing 0.57% to 1.74% higher mean objective function values than HJ. On the average, differential evolution was the best method, followed by particle swarm optimization, evolution strategy, and Nelder-Mead method. However, differences between the methods were small, and each method was the best in several stands. HJ was alone the best method in 7% of stands, and a population based method in 3% (Nelder-Mead) to 29% (differential evolution) of stands. All five methods found the same solution in 18% of stands.
  • Pukkala, University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: timo.pukkala@joensuu.fi (email)

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content
Your selected articles
Send to email
Böcker C. C., (1929) Silviculture in the Northern countries Silva Fennica vol. no. 13 article id 4454 (remove) | Edit comment
Hyppönen M., Hallikainen V. et al. (2013) The contradictory role of understory vegetation .. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 1 article id 903 (remove) | Edit comment
Kangas A., Korhonen K. T. (1995) Generalizing sample tree information with semipa.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5553 (remove) | Edit comment
Persson A., (1994) How genotype and silviculture interact in formin.. Silva Fennica vol. 28 no. 4 article id 5540 (remove) | Edit comment
Yousefzadeh H., Rajaei R. et al. (2018) Genetic diversity and differentiation of the rip.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 5 article id 10000 (remove) | Edit comment
Uuttera J., Maltamo M. (1995) Impact of regeneration method on stand structure.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 4 article id 5562 (remove) | Edit comment
Lahti T., (1995) Understorey vegetation as an indicator of forest.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 246 article id 7508 (remove) | Edit comment
Kangas A., (1991) Updated measurement data as prior information in.. Silva Fennica vol. 25 no. 3 article id 5453 (remove) | Edit comment