Category :
                    
                    Research article
                                    
                            
                    
        
            
            article id 25004,
                            category
                        Research article
                    
        
        
                            Kalle Kemppainen,
                            Kalle Kärhä,
                            Juha Laitila,
                            Antti Sairanen,
                            Ville Kankaanhuhta,
                            Heli Viiri,
                            Heli Peltola.
                    
                    
                (2025).
            
                            
                                    Evaluation of the productivity and costs of excavator-based mechanized tree planting in Finland based on automated data collection.
                            
                            
                Silva Fennica
                                                            vol.
                                        59
                                                                            no.
                                        1
                                article id 25004.
            
                            
                https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.25004
            
             
        
                                    
                                        
                Highlights:
                With proper site selection and competent machine operators, it is possible to achieve a higher productivity than 200 seedlings per operating hour in excavator-based mechanized planting; The hectare-based regeneration costs from excavator-based mechanized planting can be 3% lower than those of conventional manual planting chains; The most cost-efficient planting chain was a continuously advancing mounder combined with manual planting.
            
                
                            Abstract |
                        
                                    Full text in HTML
                             |
                            
Full text in PDF |
                        
Author Info
            
                            The poor cost-effectiveness of mechanized planting (MECP) is the main reason for the low mechanization rate of planting. In this study, we investigated the productivity of the mechanized excavator-based planting of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] H. Karst.) seedlings based on data collected by the Risutec Asta documentation system. We also compared the costs of a MECP chain with two different manual planting (MAP) chains, where mounding was carried out by a crawler excavator (EXC) or a continuously advancing mounder (CONT). The MECP of seedlings was carried out using an EXC equipped with a Risutec PM-160 planting device. Generally, the nine study sites in western Finland contained few surface obstacles (e.g., the logging residues had mainly been harvested), which made the conditions very suitable for MECP. The average production time taken by the MECP was 9 h ha–1. The operating hour (G15-h) productivity averaged 215 seedlings G15-h−1, with the mean planting time being 13.8 s seedling−1. Loading 160 seedlings into the seedling cassette took approximately 10 min (3.8 s seedling−1). Overall, the cost of the MECP was about 3% lower than for the EXC + MAP. However, when productivity was set at <210 seedlings G15-h−1, the cost of the MECP was higher than that of the EXC + MAP. Based on our findings, the most cost-efficient planting chain was CONT + MAP. However, based on our results, the required level of productivity can be achieved if the sites are suitable for MECP and the machine operators are skilled.
                
                                            - 
                            Kemppainen,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6184-8812
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            kalle.kemppainen@uef.fi https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6184-8812
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            kalle.kemppainen@uef.fi  
- 
                            Kärhä,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            kalle.karha@uef.fi
                                                                                
- 
                            Laitila,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-3319
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            juha.laitila@luke.fi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-3319
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            juha.laitila@luke.fi
- 
                            Sairanen,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8632-3797
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            anttsair@student.uef.fi https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8632-3797
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            anttsair@student.uef.fi
- 
                            Kankaanhuhta,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-5972
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@luke.fi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-5972
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@luke.fi
- 
                            Viiri,
                            UPM-Kymmene Plc, UPM Forest, Peltokatu 26 C 4, FI-33100 Tampere, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-9481
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.viiri@upm.com https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-9481
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.viiri@upm.com
- 
                            Peltola,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-9153
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.peltola@uef.fi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-9153
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.peltola@uef.fi
 
         
     
 
            
        
            
            article id 24047,
                            category
                        Research article
                    
        
        
                            Kalle Kemppainen,
                            Kalle Kärhä,
                            Juha Laitila,
                            Antti Sairanen,
                            Ville Kankaanhuhta,
                            Heli Viiri,
                            Heli Peltola.
                    
                    
                (2024).
            
                            
                                    RETRACTED: Evaluation of the productivity and costs of excavator-based mechanized tree planting in Finland based on automated data collection.
                            
                            
                Silva Fennica
                                                            vol.
                                        58
                                                                            no.
                                        5
                                article id 24047.
            
                            
                https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.24047
            
             
        
                                    
                                        
                Highlights:
                With proper site selection and competent machine operators, it is possible to achieve a higher productivity than 200 seedlings per operating hour in excavator-based mechanized planting; The hectare-based regeneration costs from excavator-based mechanized planting can be 5% lower than those of conventional manual planting chains; The most cost-efficient planting chain was a continuously advancing mounder combined with manual planting.
            
                
                            Abstract |
                        
                                    Full text in HTML
                             |
                            
Full text in PDF |
                        
Author Info
            
                            The poor cost-effectiveness of mechanized planting (MECP) is the main reason for the low mechanization rate of planting. In this study, we investigated the productivity of the mechanized excavator-based planting of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] H. Karst.) seedlings based on data collected by the Risutec Asta documentation system. We also compared the costs of a MECP chain with two different manual planting (MAP) chains, where mounding was carried out by a crawler excavator (EXC) or a continuously advancing mounder (CONT). The MECP of seedlings was carried out using an EXC equipped with a Risutec PM-160 planting device. Generally, the nine study sites in western Finland contained few surface obstacles (e.g., the logging residues had mainly been harvested), which made the conditions very suitable for MECP. The average production time taken by the MECP was 9 h ha-1. The operating hour (G15-h) productivity averaged 215 seedlings G15-h-1 , with the mean planting time being 13.8 s seedling-1. Loading 160 seedlings into the seedling cassette took approximately 10 min (3.8 s seedling-1). Overall, the cost of the MECP was about 5% lower than for the EXC + MAP. However, when productivity was set at <200 seedlings G15-h-1 , the cost of the MECP was higher than that of the EXC + MAP. Based on our findings, the most cost-efficient planting chain was CONT + MAP. However, based on our results, the required level of productivity can be achieved if the sites are suitable for MECP and the machine operators are skilled.
                
                                            - 
                            Kemppainen,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6184-8812
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            kalle.kemppainen@uef.fi https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6184-8812
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            kalle.kemppainen@uef.fi  
- 
                            Kärhä,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-2974
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            kalle.karha@uef.fi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-2974
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            kalle.karha@uef.fi
- 
                            Laitila,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-3319
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            juha.laitila@luke.fi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-3319
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            juha.laitila@luke.fi
- 
                            Sairanen,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8632-3797
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            anttsair@student.uef.fi https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8632-3797
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            anttsair@student.uef.fi
- 
                            Kankaanhuhta,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-5972
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@luke.fi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-5972
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@luke.fi
- 
                            Viiri,
                            UPM-Kymmene Plc, UPM Forest, Peltokatu 26 C 4, FI-33100 Tampere, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-9481
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.viiri@upm.com https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-9481
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.viiri@upm.com
- 
                            Peltola,
                            School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
                                                             https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-9153
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.peltola@uef.fi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-9153
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heli.peltola@uef.fi
 
         
     
 
            
        
            
            article id 10369,
                            category
                        Research article
                    
        
        
                            Tiina Laine,
                            Ville Kankaanhuhta,
                            Juho Rantala,
                            Timo Saksa.
                    
                    
                (2020).
            
                            
                                    Effects of spot mounding and inverting on growth of conifers, exposed mineral soil and natural birch regeneration.
                            
                            
                Silva Fennica
                                                            vol.
                                        54
                                                                            no.
                                        5
                                article id 10369.
            
                            
                https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10369
            
             
        
                                    
                                        
                Highlights:
                There were 21% fewer naturally regenerated birches ha–1 in inverted areas (22 951) compared to spot mounded areas (29 086); Spot mounding exposed slightly, but not statistically significantly, larger area of mineral soil than inverting; There was no difference in seedling mortality or growth between the site preparation methods.
            
                
                            Abstract |
                        
                                    Full text in HTML
                             |
                            
Full text in PDF |
                        
Author Info
            
                            In Nordic forests, consistent evidence about better seedling survival rate and increased growth due to site preparation have been obtained in numerous studies. Proper site preparation method can reduce costs of the whole regeneration chain through its effects on survival of planted seedlings, abundance of natural regeneration and competition in early stand development. This study compared the natural regeneration of birches (silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) and downy birch (B. pubescens Ehrh.)), amount of exposed mineral soil, and growth of planted seedlings between spot mounding and inverting site preparation methods. Present study was conducted in eight forest stands established in 2012 or 2015. Even though difference was not statistically significant, inverting exposed less mineral soil than spot mounding and thus reduced the natural regeneration of birch seedlings by 6135 seedlings ha–1 compared to spot mounding. However, the variation between regeneration areas was remarkable. There was no difference in seedling mortality or growth between the site preparation methods. In order to achieve high growth of conifers, moderate amount of exposed mineral soil and thus less naturally regenerated birch, inverting should be favored over spot mounding.
                
                                            - 
                            Laine,
                            Metsä Group, P.O. Box 208, FI-70101 Kuopio, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            tiina.laine@metsagroup.com
                                                                                          
- 
                            Kankaanhuhta,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@luke.fi
                                                                                
- 
                            Rantala,
                            Metsä Group, P.O. Box 10, FI-02020 METSÄ, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            juho.rantala@metsagroup.com
                                                                                
- 
                            Saksa,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            timo.saksa@luke.fi
                                                                                
 
         
     
 
            
        
            
            article id 1665,
                            category
                        Research article
                    
        
        
                            Lauri Haataja,
                            Ville Kankaanhuhta,
                            Timo Saksa.
                    
                    
                (2018).
            
                            
                                    Reliability of self-control method in the management of non-industrial private forests.
                            
                            
                Silva Fennica
                                                            vol.
                                        52
                                                                            no.
                                        1
                                article id 1665.
            
                            
                https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1665
            
             
        
                                    
                                        
                Highlights:
                Self-control method was found reliable at the main stages of the forest regeneration process; Only slight overestimation was found in self-control results of soil preparation and planting and small underestimation in self-control of young stand management; Diverse utilizing of self-control data is possible in support of service providers operations.
            
                
                            Abstract |
                        
                                    Full text in HTML
                             |
                            
Full text in PDF |
                        
Author Info
            
                            This study seeks to determine the extent to which self-control data can be relied upon in the management of private forests. Self-control (SC) requires the forest workers to evaluate their own work quality to ensure the clients’ needs are met in terms of soil preparation, planting and young stand management. Self-control data were compared to an independent evaluation of the same worksites. Each dataset had a hierarchical structure (e.g., sample plot, regeneration area and contractor), and key quality indicators (i.e., number of prepared mounds, planted seedlings or crop trees) were measured for each plot.  Self-control and independent-assessments (IA) were analyzed by fitting a multi-level multivariate model containing explanatory variables. No significant differences were observed in terms of soil preparation (number of mounds) or young stand management (number of crop trees) between self-control and independent-assessments. However, the self-control planting data included a slight but significant overestimation of the number of planted seedlings. Discrepancies are discussed in terms of sampling error and other explanatory factors. According to overall results, self-control methods are reliable at every stage of the forest regeneration process. As such, the diverse utilizing of self-control data is possible in support of service providers operations.
                        
                
                                            - 
                            Haataja,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            lauritapiohaataja@gmail.com
                                                                                          
- 
                            Kankaanhuhta,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@luke.fi
                                                                                
- 
                            Saksa,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            timo.saksa@luke.fi
                                                                                
 
         
     
 
            
        
            
            article id 1514,
                            category
                        Research article
                    
        
        
                            Heidi Hallongren,
                            Ville Kankaanhuhta,
                            Mikael Kukkonen.
                    
                    
                (2016).
            
                            
                                    Cleaning Scots pine seedling stands with mechanical uprooters – a work quality comparison of two related devices.
                            
                            
                Silva Fennica
                                                            vol.
                                        50
                                                                            no.
                                        3
                                article id 1514.
            
                            
                https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1514
            
             
        
                                    
                                        
                Highlights:
                The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better than the wider original device; Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account; Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.
            
                
                            Abstract |
                        
                                    Full text in HTML
                             |
                            
Full text in PDF |
                        
Author Info
            
                            Commercial forests require early cleaning to ensure the unhindered and uniform growth of crop trees. In order to be cost effective, non-crop vegetation should be uprooted to prevent their recovery. Performing this work manually is a labour-intensive task but it can be done mechanically. We evaluated the efficiency of two uprooting devices in direct seeded Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands ca. 1 m tall. Productivity and quality of the uprooting work was investigated across eight stands and ca. 160 sample plots in northern Karelia, eastern Finland. Time consumption of the uprooters was analyzed through a linear regression model and the work quality through a multilevel multivariate model in terms of the number of individual Scots pine seedlings, processing units (i.e., a bunch of seedlings to be harvested in the future) and broadleaves. The productivity of the narrower modified device was significantly better in terms of time consumption than the wider original device. Work quality did not differ significantly between devices when stand characteristics, regeneration success and pre-existing damage were taken into account. Results indicate that mechanical uprooting devices may be further developed to a cost-effective alternative to motor-manual techniques for the early cleaning of direct seeded commercial Scots pine stands.
                
                                            - 
                            Hallongren,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Management and Production of Renewable Resources, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            heidi.hallongren@luke.fi
                                                                                          
- 
                            Kankaanhuhta,
                            Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Management and Production of Renewable Resources, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@luke.fi
                                                                                
- 
                            Kukkonen,
                            University of Eastern Finland, School of Forest Sciences. P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            mikaelkukkonen@hotmail.com
                                                                                
 
         
     
 
            
        
            
            article id 157,
                            category
                        Research article
                    
        
        
                            Ville Kankaanhuhta,
                            Timo Saksa,
                            Heikki Smolander.
                    
                    
                (2010).
            
                            
                                    The effect of quality management on forest regeneration activities in privately-owned forests in southern Finland.
                            
                            
                Silva Fennica
                                                            vol.
                                        44
                                                                            no.
                                        2
                                article id 157.
            
                            
                https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.157
            
             
        
                                    
                                    
                            Abstract |
                        
                                    View details
                             |
                            
Full text in PDF |
                        
Author Info
            
                            This study describes the effect of quality management on forest  regeneration activities in privately-owned forests in southern Finland.  The study material consists of two mail surveys conducted in 2006 and  2007. The questionnaires were sent to forestry professionals in Forest  Owners’ Associations (FOAs), who had either participated (participants)  or not (non-participants) in the forest regeneration quality management  interventions in years 2000–2006. Quality management interventions of  the FOAs included field inventories, feedback meetings, and education  sessions about quality techniques. The activities of participant and  non-participant FOAs were compared in terms of the available resources,  the actions taken, and the aspirations for improvement. In the FOAs,  which had participated in quality management, the number of excavator  contractors had increased by 16% more than in the non-participant FOAs.  The contractors had acquired 23% more soil preparation equipment under  the supervision of the participant forestry professionals. The soil  preparation method used in conjunction with Norway spruce that had most  increased in use was patch mounding. Seedlings that were 1.5 years and  older were used by participant forestry professionals in the planting of  Norway spruce 11% more than by non-participants. The planting workers  had attended 14% more educational sessions, while the use of  self-control measurements in soil preparation and planting density had  been adopted 10% more frequently under the supervision of the forestry  professionals participating in the quality management. A greater  interest in obtaining feedback by using quality control inventories was  also found among forestry professionals who participated in quality  management.
                        
                
                                            - 
                            Kankaanhuhta,
                            Finnish Forest Research Institute, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@metla.fi
                                                                                          
- 
                            Saksa,
                            Finnish Forest Research Institute, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ts@nn.fi
                                                                                
- 
                            Smolander,
                            Finnish Forest Research Institute, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            hs@nn.fi
                                                                                
 
         
     
 
            
        
            
            article id 217,
                            category
                        Research article
                    
        
        
                            Ville Kankaanhuhta,
                            Timo Saksa,
                            Heikki Smolander.
                    
                    
                (2009).
            
                            
                                    Variation in the results of Norway spruce planting and Scots pine direct seeding in privately-owned forests in southern Finland.
                            
                            
                Silva Fennica
                                                            vol.
                                        43
                                                                            no.
                                        1
                                article id 217.
            
                            
                https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.217
            
             
        
                                    
                                    
                            Abstract |
                        
                                    View details
                             |
                            
Full text in PDF |
                        
Author Info
            
                            This study describes the variation in the planting results for  3-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and 4-year-old Scots  pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) using direct seeding in privately-owned  regeneration areas in southern Finland. The study material consists of  operative forest regeneration quality management inventory areas from  the years 2000–2006. The effect of both the regional and the  administrative levels as well as ecological factors was modelled on the  basis of the hierarchy structure forestry centre, Forest Owners’  Association (= FOA), forestry professional, regeneration area and sample  plot. The major part of the variation occurred at the sample plot and  regeneration area level. Particular attention was paid to observation of  the clustered spatial distribution of Scots pine seedlings. The FOA and  forestry professional levels explained 5% of the variation in Norway  spruce planting and 11% of the variation in Scots pine direct seeding.  Applied forest regeneration operations, site and soil characteristics  were included in the fixed effects. In the planting of Norway spruce the  most important factor explaining the regeneration result was soil  preparation. Mounding produced better results than patching and disc  trenching. The site and soil characteristics were other important  factors in the operations. The selection of direct seeding of Scots pine  on too fertile, fine textured or moist sites yielded poor results.
                        
                
                                            - 
                            Kankaanhuhta,
                            Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research Unit, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ville.kankaanhuhta@metla.fi
                                                                                          
- 
                            Saksa,
                            Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research Unit, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            ts@nn.fi
                                                                                
- 
                            Smolander,
                            Finnish Forest Research Institute, Suonenjoki Research Unit, Juntintie 154, FI-77600 Suonenjoki, Finland
                                                        E-mail:
                                                            hs@nn.fi